More than scientists: How message and messenger attributes influence viewers’ climate change intentions

PLOS One | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331672 September 10, 2025 19 / 20 48. MacKrill K, Silvester C, Petrie KJ, Pennebaker JW. What makes an idea worth spreading? Language markers of popularity in TED Talks by aca- demics and other speakers. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2021;72(6):1–11. 49. Özmen MU, Yücel ME. Drivers of popularity of online information: content, context and psychological processes. Business and Economics Research Journal. 2023. 50. Fox AK, Royne Stafford MB. Olympians on Twitter: a linguistic perspective of the role of authenticity, clout, and expertise in social media advertis- ing. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising. 2021;42(3):294–309. 51. Markowitz DM. Putting your best pet forward: Language patterns of persuasion in online pet advertisements. J Applied Social Pyschol. 2019;50(3):160–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12647 52. Ta VP, Boyd RL, Seraj S, Keller A, Griffith C, Loggarakis A, et al. An inclusive, real-world investigation of persuasion in language and verbal behav- ior. J Comput Soc Sci. 2022;5(1):883–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-021-00153-5 PMID: 34869936 53. Claessens DL, Bender M. Expressions of Affiliation, Achievement, Power and Trust in Online User Reviews. 54. Ashokkumar A, Pennebaker JW. Tracking group identity through natural language within groups. PNAS Nexus. 2022;1(2):pgac022. https://doi. org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac022 PMID: 35774418 55. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude

change. New York, NY: Springer New York. 1986. p. 1–24. 56. Collins H, Evans RC. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 2007. 57. Anderson A. Sources, media, and modes of climate change communication: the role of celebrities. WIREs Climate Change. 2011;2(4):535–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.119 58. Anderson AA, Myers TA, Maibach EW, Cullen H, Gandy J, Witte J, et al. If They Like You, They Learn from You: How a Brief Weathercaster- Delivered Climate Education Segment Is Moderated by Viewer Evaluations of the Weathercaster. Weather, Climate, and Society. 2013;5(4):367– 77. https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-12-00051.1 59. Buys L, Aird R, van Megen K, Miller E, Sommerfeld J. Perceptions of climate change and trust in information providers in rural Australia. Public Underst Sci. 2014;23(2):170–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512449948 PMID: 23825246 60. Corner A, Roberts O, Chiari S, Völler S, Mayrhuber ES, Mandl S, et al. How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. WIREs Climate Change. 2015;6(5):523–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.353 61. Krantz SA, Monroe MC. Message Framing Matters: Communicating Climate Change with Forest Landowners. Journal of Forestry. 2016;114(2):108–15. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.14-057 62. Moser SC, Dilling L. Communicating climate change: Closing the science-action gap. In: Norgaard R, Schlosberg D, Dryzek J, editors. Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2011.

63. Carli LL. Social Influence and Gender. In: Harkins SG, Williams KD, Burger J, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Social Influence. 2017. 64. Sugimoto CR, Thelwall M, Larivière V, Tsou A, Mongeon P, Macaluso B. Scientists popularizing science: characteristics and impact of TED talk presenters. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e62403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062403 PMID: 23638069 65. Newman R, Furnham A, Weis L, Gee M, Cardos R, Lay A, et al. Non-Verbal Presence: How Changing Your Behaviour Can Increase Your Ratings for Persuasion, Leadership and Confidence. PSYCH. 2016;07(04):488–99. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2016.74050 66. Gheorghiu AI, Callan MJ, Skylark WJ. A Thin Slice of Science Communication: Are People’s Evaluations of TED Talks Predicted by Superficial Impressions of the Speakers?. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2019;11(1):117–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618810896 67. Metag J, Schäfer MS, Füchslin T, Barsuhn T, Kleinen-von Königslöw K. Perceptions of Climate Change Imagery. Science Communication. 2016;38(2):197–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016635181 68. O’Neill S, Nicholson-Cole S. Fear won’t do it: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci- ence Communication. 2009;30(3):355–79. 69. O’Neill SJ. Image matters: Climate change imagery in US, UK and Australian newspapers. Geoforum. 2013;49:10–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. geoforum.2013.04.030 70. O’Neill SJ, Boykoff M, Niemeyer S, Day SA. On the use of imagery for climate change engagement. Global Environmental Change.

2013;23(2):413–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.006 71. Smith NW, Joffe H. Climate change in the British press: the role of the visual. Journal of Risk Research. 2009;12(5):647–63. https://doi. org/10.1080/13669870802586512 72. Höijer B. Emotional anchoring and objectification in the media reporting on climate change. Public Underst Sci. 2010;19(6):717–31. https://doi. org/10.1177/0963662509348863 PMID: 21560545 73. León B, Erviti MC. Science in pictures: Visual representation of climate change in Spain’s television news. Public Underst Sci. 2015;24(2):183–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513500196 PMID: 24013276 74. Lester L, Cottle S. Visualizing climate change: Television news and ecological citizenship. International Journal of Communication. 2009;3(17). 75. De Lara A, García-Avilés JA, Revuelta G. Online video on climate change: a comparison between television and web formats. JCOM. 2017;16(01):A04. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.16010204