Climate variables are not the dominant predictor of Arctic shorebird distributions
pmc-PMC10191349.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 14 trang
39. Keith TZ. Multiple regression and beyond: an introduction to multiple regression and structural equation modeling. 2nd edition. New York; London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2015. 592 p. 40. Walker DA. Hierarchical subdivision of Arctic tundra based on vegetation response to climate, parent material and topography. Glob Change Biol. 2000 Dec; 6(S1):19–34. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365- 2486.2000.06010.x PMID: 35026934 41. Le´ andri-Breton DJ, Bêty J. Vulnerability to predation may affect species distribution: plovers with broader arctic breeding range nest in safer habitat. Sci Rep. 2020 Dec; 10(1):5032. https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41598-020-61956-6 PMID: 32193488 42. Po¨ yry J, Luoto M, Heikkinen RK, Saarinen K. Species traits are associated with the quality of bioclimatic models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2008 May; 17(3):403–14. 43. Kadmon R, Farber O, Danin A. A systematic analysis of factors affecting the performance of climatic envelope models. Ecol Appl. 2003 Jun; 13(3):853–67. 44. Wiens JA. Spatial Scaling in Ecology. Funct Ecol. 1989; 3(4):385. 45. Mackey BG, Lindenmayer DB. Towards a hierarchical framework for modelling the spatial distribution of animals: Modelling the spatial distribution of animals. J Biogeogr. 2001 Dec 21; 28(9):1147–66. 46. Johnson DH. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource prefer- ence. Ecology. 1980 Feb; 61(1):65–71. 47. Luoto M, Virkkala R, Heikkinen RK. The role of land cover in bioclimatic models depends on spatial res- olution. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2006 Aug 29; 0(0):061120101210017
48. Bucklin DN, Basille M, Benscoter AM, Brandt LA, Mazzotti FJ, Romañach SS, et al. Comparing species distribution models constructed with different subsets of environmental predictors. Thuiller W, editor. Distrib Divers. 2015 Jan; 21(1):23–35. 49. Dubuis A, Giovanettina S, Pellissier L, Pottier J, Vittoz P, Guisan A. Improving the prediction of plant species distribution and community composition by adding edaphic to topo-climatic variables. Rocchini D, editor. J Veg Sci. 2013 Jul; 24(4):593–606. 50. Titeux N, Henle K, Mihoub JB, Regos A, Geijzendorffer IR, Cramer W, et al. Biodiversity scenarios neglect future land-use changes. Glob Change Biol. 2016 Jul; 22(7):2505–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/ gcb.13272 PMID: 26950650 51. Verburg PH, van Asselen S, van der Zanden EH, Stehfest E. The representation of landscapes in global scale assessments of environmental change. Landsc Ecol. 2013 Jul; 28(6):1067–80. 52. Le Prestre PG, editor. Governing global biodiversity: The evolution and implementation of the conven- tion on biological diversity. Routledge; 2017. PLOS ONE Climate variables are not the dominant predictor of Arctic shorebird distributions PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285115 May 17, 2023 14 / 14