Climate variables are not the dominant predictor of Arctic shorebird distributions

15. Jenkins DA, Lecomte N, Andrews G, Yannic G, Schaefer JA. Biotic interactions govern the distribution of coexisting ungulates in the Arctic Archipelago–A case for conservation planning. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2020 Dec; 24:e01239. 16. Regos A, Gagne L, Alcaraz-Segura D, Honrado JP, Domı´nguez J. Effects of species traits and environ- mental predictors on performance and transferability of ecological niche models. Sci Rep. 2019 Dec; 9 (1):4221. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40766-5 PMID: 30862919 17. Wisz MS, Pottier J, Kissling WD, Pellissier L, Lenoir J, Damgaard CF, et al. The role of biotic interac- tions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling. Biol Rev. 2013 Feb; 88(1):15–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00235.x PMID: 22686347 18. Sexton JP, McIntyre PJ, Angert AL, Rice KJ. Evolution and Ecology of Species Range Limits. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2009 Dec 1; 40(1):415–36. 19. Piedallu C, Ge´ gout JC, Perez V, Lebourgeois F. Soil water balance performs better than climatic water variables in tree species distribution modelling: Soil water balance improves tree species distribution models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2013 Apr; 22(4):470–82. 20. Mod HK, Scherrer D, Luoto M, Guisan A. What we use is not what we know: environmental predictors in plant distribution models. Scheiner S, editor. J Veg Sci. 2016 Nov; 27(6):1308–22. 21. Cunningham JA, Kesler DC, Lanctot RB. Habitat and social factors influence nest-site selection in Arc- tic-breeding shorebirds. The Auk. 2016 Jul; 133(3):364–77.

22. Smith PA, Gilchrist HG, Smith JNM. Effects of nest habitat, food, and parental behaviour on shorebird nest success. The Condor. 2007; 109:15–31. 23. Swift RJ, Rodewald AD, Senner NR. Breeding habitat of a declining shorebird in a changing environ- ment. Polar Biol. 2017 Sep; 40(9):1777–86. 24. Wauchope HS, Shaw JD, Varpe Ø, Lappo EG, Boertmann D, Lanctot RB, et al. Rapid climate-driven loss of breeding habitat for Arctic migratory birds. Glob Change Biol. 2017 Mar; 23(3):1085–94. https:// doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13404 PMID: 27362976 25. Lathrop RG, Sacatelli R, Niles L, Mizrahi D, Smith J, Dey A. Arctic Shorebird Habitat Climate Change Resilience Analysis for the Arctic Migratory Birds Initiative (AMBI)—the Americas Flyway Action Plan. Montreal, Canada: Comission for Environmental Cooperation; 2019 p. 137. 26. Lathrop RG, Niles L, Smith P, Peck M, Dey A, Sacatelli R, et al. Mapping and modeling the breeding habitat of the Western Atlantic Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa) at local and regional scales. The Con- dor. 2018 Aug; 120(3):650–65. 27. Saalfeld ST, Lanctot RB, Brown SC, Saalfeld DT, Johnson JA, Andres BA, et al. Predicting breeding shorebird distributions on the Arctic Coastal Plain of Alaska. Ecosphere. 2013 Jan; 4(1):art16. 28. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2022. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/ 29. Bart JR, Johnston VH, editors. Arctic shorebirds in North America: a decade of monitoring. Berkley:

Univ of California Press.; 2012. (Studies in avian biology; vol. 44). 30. Walker DA, Gould WA, Maier HA, Raynolds MK. The Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map: AVHRR- derived base maps, environmental controls, and integrated mapping procedures. Int J Remote Sens. 2002 Jan; 23(21):4551–70. 31. Fick SE, Hijmans RJ. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 2017 Oct; 37(12):4302–15. 32. Patterson T, Vaughn Kelso N. Natural Earth [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 18]. Available from: naturalearthdata.com 33. O’Leary D III, Hall DK, Medler M, Matthews R, Flower A. Snowmelt Timing Maps Derived from MODIS for North America, Version 2, 2001–2018 [Internet]. ORNL DAAC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA; 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1712 34. Olthof I, Latifovic R, Pouliot D. Development of a circa 2000 land cover map of northern Canada at 30 m resolution from Landsat. Can J Remote Sens. 2009; 35(2):14. 35. Jackson HB, Fahrig L. What size is a biologically relevant landscape? Landsc Ecol. 2012 Aug; 27 (7):929–41. 36. McGarigal K, Wan HY, Zeller KA, Timm BC, Cushman SA. Multi-scale habitat selection modeling: a review and outlook. Landsc Ecol. 2016 Aug; 31(6):1161–75. 37. Lefcheck JS. piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modeling in R for ecology, ecolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol Evol. 2016; 7(5):573–9. 38. Murphy M. semEff: Automatic Calculation of Effects for Piecewise Structural Equation Models [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semEff PLOS ONE

Climate variables are not the dominant predictor of Arctic shorebird distributions PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285115 May 17, 2023 13 / 14