Climate and water-table levels regulate peat accumulation rates across Europe

PLOS One | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327422 July 23, 2025 14 / 16 13. Ise T, Dunn AL, Wofsy SC, Moorcroft PR. High sensitivity of peat decomposition to climate change through water-table feedback. Nature Geosci- ence. 2008;1:763–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo331 14. Loisel J, Yu Z. Recent acceleration of carbon accumulation in a boreal peatland, south central Alaska. JGR Biogeosciences. 2013;118(1):41–53. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jg001978 15. Parry LE, West LJ, Holden J, Chapman PJ. Evaluating approaches for estimating peat depth. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2014;119(4):567–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jg002411 16. Green SM, Baird AJ, Holden J, Reed D, Birch K, Jones P. An experimental study on the response of blanket bog vegetation and water tables to ditch blocking. Wetlands Ecol Manage. 2017;25(6):703–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-017-9545-z 17. Swindles GT, Morris PJ, Wheeler J, Smith MW, Bacon KL, Edward Turner T, et al. Resilience of peatland ecosystem services over millennial times- cales: evidence from a degraded British bog. Journal of Ecology. 2016;104(3):621–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12565 18. Milner AM, Baird AJ, Green SM, Swindles GT, Young DM, Sanderson NK, et al. A regime shift from erosion to carbon accumulation in a temperate northern peatland. Journal of Ecology. 2020;109(1):125–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13453 19. Belyea LR, Baird AJ. Beyond “the limits to peat bog growth”: cross-scale feedback in peatland development. Ecological Monographs.

2006;76(3):299–322. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(2006)076[0299:btltpb]2.0.co;2 20. Dommain R, Dittrich I, Giesen W, Joosten H, Rais DS, Silvius M, et al. Ecosystem services, degradation and restoration of peat swamps in the Southeast Asian tropics. In: Peatland restoration and ecosystem services: Science, policy and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016;253–88. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/peatland-restoration-and-ecosystem-services/ ecosystem-services-degradation-and-restoration-of-peat-swamps-in-the-south-east-asian-tropics/24B1396EE935F2842372C47A53DB45E0 21. Loisel J, Gallego-Sala A. Ecological resilience of restored peatlands to climate change. Commun Earth Environ. 2022;3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/ s43247-022-00547-x 22. Clymo RS. The limits to peat bog growth. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 1984;303(1117):605–54. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1984.0002 23. Waddington JM, Morris PJ, Kettridge N, Granath G, Thompson DK, Moore PA. Hydrological feedbacks in northern peatlands. Ecohydrology. 2014;8(1):113–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1493 24. Yu Z, Loisel J, Brosseau DP, Beilman DW, Hunt SJ. Global peatland dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum. Geophysical Research Letters. 2010;37(13). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl043584 25. Turetsky MR, Benscoter B, Page S, Rein G, van der Werf GR, Watts A. Global vulnerability of peatlands to fire and carbon loss. Nature Geosci. 2014;8(1):11–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2325

26. Wilson RM, Hopple AM, Tfaily MM, Sebestyen SD, Schadt CW, Pfeifer-Meister L, et al. Stability of peatland carbon to rising temperatures. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13723. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13723 PMID: 27958276 27. Morris PJ, Swindles GT, Valdes PJ, Ivanovic RF, Gregoire LJ, Smith MW, et al. Global peatland initiation driven by regionally asynchronous warm- ing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(19):4851–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717838115 PMID: 29666256 28. Turetsky MR, Mack MC, Hollingsworth TN, Harden JW. The role of mosses in ecosystem succession and function in Alaska’s boreal forestThis arti- cle is one of a selection of papers from The Dynamics of Change in Alaska’s Boreal Forests: Resilience and Vulnerability in Response to Climate Warming. Can J For Res. 2010;40(7):1237–64. https://doi.org/10.1139/x10-072 29. Charman DJ, Beilman DW, Blaauw M, Booth RK, Brewer S, Chambers FM, et al. Climate-related changes in peatland carbon accumulation during the last millennium. Biogeosciences. 2013;10(2):929–44. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-929-2013 30. Malmer N, Johansson T, Olsrud M, Christensen TR. Vegetation, climatic changes and net carbon sequestration in a North‐Scandinavian subarctic mire over 30 years. Global Change Biology. 2005;11(11):1895–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01042.x 31. Robroek BJM, Jassey VEJ, Payne RJ, Martí M, Bragazza L, Bleeker A, et al. Taxonomic and functional turnover are decoupled in European peat bogs. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1161. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01350-5 PMID: 29079831

32. Dorrepaal E, Aerts R, Cornelissen JHC, Callaghan TV, Van Logtestijn RSP. Summer warming and increased winter snow cover affect Sphagnum fuscum growth, structure and production in a sub‐arctic bog. Global Change Biology. 2003;10(1):93–104. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2003.00718.x 33. Moore TR, Roulet NT, Waddington JM. Uncertainty in predicting the effect of climatic change on the carbon cycling of Canadian peatlands. Climatic Change. 1998;40(2):229–45. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005408719297 34. Tiemeyer B, Freibauer A, Borraz EA, Augustin J, Bechtold M, Beetz S, et al. A new methodology for organic soils in national greenhouse gas inven- tories: Data synthesis, derivation and application. Ecological Indicators. 2020;109:105838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105838 35. Tanneberger F, Appulo L, Ewert S, Lakner S, Ó Brolcháin N, Peters J, et al. The Power of Nature‐Based Solutions: How Peatlands Can Help Us to Achieve Key EU Sustainability Objectives. Advanced Sustainable Systems. 2020;5(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202000146 36. Couwenberg J, Thiele A, Tanneberger F, Augustin J, Bärisch S, Dubovik D, et al. Assessing greenhouse gas emissions from peatlands using vege- tation as a proxy. Hydrobiologia. 2011;674(1):67–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0729-x 37. Wichtmann W, Schröder C, Joosten H. Paludiculture-productive use of wet peatlands. Stuttgart: Schweizerbart Sche Vlgsb. 2016. 38. Gaudig G, Tanneberger F. Peatland Science and Conservation: Contributions of the Greifswald Mire Centre, Germany. Innovations in Landscape

Research. Springer International Publishing. 2019;611–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30069-2_28