Impacts of climate change on high priority fruit fly species in Australia

60. O’Loughlin GT, East RA, Meats A. Survival, development rates and generation times of the Queensland fruit fly, Dacus tryoni, in a marginally favourable climate: experiments in Victoria. Australian Journal of Zoology. 1984; 32(3):353–361. 61. Muthuthantri S, Maelzer D, Zalucki MP, Clarke AR. The seasonal phenology of Bactrocera tryoni (Frog- gatt)(Diptera: Tephritidae) in Queensland. Austral Entomology. 2010; 49(3):221–233. 62. Sutherst RW, Collyer BS, Yonow T. The vulnerability of Australian horticulture to the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera (Dacus) tryoni, under climate change. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2000; 51(4):467–480. 63. Szyniszewska AM, Tatem AJ. Global assessment of seasonal potential distribution of Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). PLoS One. 2014; 9(11):e111582. https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pone.0111582 PMID: 25375649 64. Allwood A, Angeles T. Host records of fruit flies (family Tephritidae) in the Northern Territory. Queens- land Journal of Agricultural and Animal Sciences. 1979, 1:105–113. 65. Cameron EC. Fruit Fly Pests of Northwestern Australia [Thesis]: University of Sydney.; 2006. 66. Dominiak BC, Worsley P. Review of cucumber fruit fly, Bactrocera cucumis (French)(Diptera: Tephriti- dae: Dacinae) in Australia: Part 1, host range, surveillance and distribution. Crop Protection. 2018; 106:79–85. 67. Fitt GP. New records of Dacus (Austrodacus) cucumis French from the Northern Territory, Australia (Diptera: Tephritidae). Australian Journal of Entomology. 1980; 19(3):240–240.

68. Gibbs G. The comparative ecology of two closely related, sympatric species of Dacus (Diptera) in Queensland. Australian Journal of Zoology. 1967; 15(6):1123–1139. 69. Wang Y, Yu H, Raphael K, Gilchrist A. Genetic delineation of sibling species of the pest fruit fly Bacto- cera (Diptera: Tephritidae) using microsatellites. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 2003; 93(4):351– 360. https://doi.org/10.1079/ber2003249 PMID: 12908921 70. Drew R, Hooper G, Bateman M. Economic fruit flies of the South Pacific Region. Queensland Depart- ment of Primary Industries.1982. 71. Wisz MS, Hijmans R, Li J, Peterson AT, Graham C, Guisan A, et al. Effects of sample size on the perfor- mance of species distribution models. Diversity and distributions. 2008; 14(5):763–773. 72. Syfert MM, Smith MJ, Coomes DA. The effects of sampling bias and model complexity on the predictive performance of MaxEnt species distribution models. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(2):e55158. https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pone.0055158 PMID: 23457462 73. Veloz SD. Spatially autocorrelated sampling falsely inflates measures of accuracy for presence-only niche models. Journal of Biogeography. 2009; 36(12):2290–2299. 74. Guille´n D, Sa´ nchez R. Expansion of the national fruit fly control programme in Argentina. Area-wide Control of Insect Pests. 2007:653–660. 75. Phillips SJ. Transferability, sample selection bias and background data in presence-only modelling: a response to Peterson et al.(2007). Ecography. 2008; 31(2):272–278.

76. Franklin J. Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction: Cambridge University Press; 2010. 77. Pheloung P, Williams P, Halloy S. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluat- ing plant introductions. Journal of Environmental Management. 1999; 57(4):239–251. 78. Newbold T, Reader T, El-Gabbas A, Berg W, Shohdi WM, Zalat S, et al. Testing the accuracy of species distribution models using species records from a new field survey. Oikos. 2010; 119(8):1326–1334. 79. Elith J. Predicting distributions of invasive species. 2013. arXiv:1312.0851. 80. Salamin N, Wu¨ est RO, Lavergne S, Thuiller W, Pearman PB. Assessing rapid evolution in a changing environment. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2010; 25(12):692–698. 81. Charmantier A, McCleery RH, Cole LR, Perrins C, Kruuk LE, Sheldon BC. Adaptive phenotypic plastic- ity in response to climate change in a wild bird population. Science. 2008; 320(5877):800–803. https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.1157174 PMID: 18467590 82. Bush A, Mokany K, Catullo R, Hoffmann A, Kellermann V, Sgrò C, et al. Incorporating evolutionary adaptation in species distribution modelling reduces projected vulnerability to climate change. Ecology Letters. 2016; 19(12):1468–1478. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12696 PMID: 27873482 Impacts of climate change on high priority fruit fly species in Australia PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213820 February 13, 2020 19 / 19