Climate change risk perception in the USA and alignment with sustainable travel behaviours

23. Sheppard SR, Shaw A, Flanders D, Burch S, Wiek A, Carmichael J, et al. Future visioning of local cli- mate change: a framework for community engagement and planning with scenarios and visualisation. Futures. 2011 May 1; 43(4):400–12. 24. Newby-Clark IR, Ross M. Conceiving the past and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2003 Jul; 29(7):807–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029007001 PMID: 15018670 25. McElwee RO, Brittain L. Optimism for the world’s future versus the personal future: Application to envi- ronmental attitudes. Current Psychology. 2009 Jun 1; 28(2):133–45. 26. Marlon J, Howe P, Mildenberger M, Leiserowitz A, Wang X. Yale Climate Opinion Maps 2019. 2019 Sep 1 [cited 2 February 2020]. In: Yale program on Climate Change Communication [Internet]. [about 7 screens]. Available from https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/visualizations-data/ycom-us/ 27. Harre´ N. Psychology for a better world: Working with people to save the planet. Auckland University Press; 2018 May 10. 28. Eastin J, Grundmann R, Prakash A. The two limits debates: “Limits to Growth” and climate change. Futures. 2011 Feb 1; 43(1):16–26. 29. Pew Research Center. The politics of climate. 2016 Oct 4 [cited 2 February 2020] [Internet] Available from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2016/10/PS_2016.10.04_ Politics-of-Climate_FINAL.pdf PLOS ONE Climate change risk perception in the USA and alignment with sustainable travel behaviours PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244545 February 3, 2021 15 / 17

30. Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L. Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global environmental change. 2007 Aug 1; 17(3– 4):445–59. 31. Keith DW. Geoengineering the climate: History and prospect. Annual review of energy and the environ- ment. 2000 Nov; 25(1):245–84. 32. Sagristano MD, Trope Y, Liberman N. Time-dependent gambling: Odds now, money later. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2002 Sep; 131(3):364. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.131.3. 364 PMID: 12214752 33. Shelley MK. Gain/loss asymmetry in risky intertemporal choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1994 Jul 1; 59(1):124–59. 34. Anderson K. Duality in climate science. Nature Geoscience. 2015 Oct 12; 8(12):898. 35. Corner A, Parkhill K, Pidgeon N, Vaughan NE. Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Global Environmental Change. 2013 Oct 1; 23(5):938–47. 36. Fuss S, Canadell JG, Peters GP, Tavoni M, Andrew RM, Ciais P, et al. Betting on negative emissions. Nature climate change. 2014 Oct; 4(10):850–3. 37. Peeters P, Higham J, Kutzner D, Cohen S, Go¨ssling S. Are technology myths stalling aviation climate policy?. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2016 May 1; 44:30–42. 38. Sims R, Schaeffer R, Creutzig F, Cruz-Nu´ ñez X, D’Agosto M, Dimitriu D, et al. Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. In: Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2014.

39. Scott D, Hall CM, Go¨ssling S. A report on the Paris Climate Change Agreement and its implications for tourism: Why we will always have Paris. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2016 Jul 2; 24(7):933–48. 40. Frittaion CM, Duinker PN, Grant JL. Narratives of the future: suspending disbelief in forest-sector sce- narios. Futures. 2010 Dec 1; 42(10):1156–65. 41. Fan W, Yan Z. Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review. Computers in human behavior. 2010 Mar 1; 26(2):132–9. 42. Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self- mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1994 Dec; 67(6):1063. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063 PMID: 7815302 43. Kilbourne WE, Beckmann SC, Thelen E. The role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental atti- tudes: A multinational examination. Journal of business Research. 2002 Mar 1; 55(3):193–204. 44. Lowe T, Brown K, Dessai S, de Franc¸a Doria M, Haynes K, Vincent K. Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public understanding of science. 2006 Oct; 15(4):435–57. 45. Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD. The “new environmental paradigm”. The journal of environmental education. 1978 Jul 1; 9(4):10–9.https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978. 10801875 46. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2006 Jan 1; 3(2):77–101.

47. Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage; 2015. 48. Krippendorff K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications; 2018 May 9. 49. United States Census Bureau. Age and Sex Coposition in the United States: 2016. 2018 Aug 9 [Cited 2 Febuary 2020]. In United States Census Bureau [Internet]. [about 3 screens] Available from: https:// www.census.gov/data/tables/2016/demo/age-and-sex/2016-age-sex-composition.html 50. United States Census Bureau. Educational Attainment in the United States: 2016. 2017 March 31 [Cited 2 February 2020]. In United States Census Bureau [Internet]. [about 2 screens]. Available from: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2016/demo/education-attainment/cps-detailed-tables.html 51. Bentley FR, Daskalova N, White B. Comparing the reliability of Amazon Mechanical Turk and Survey Monkey to traditional market research surveys. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2017 May:1092–1099. 52. Heen MS, Lieberman JD, Miethe TD. A comparison of different online sampling approaches for generat- ing national samples. Center for Crime and Justice Policy. 2014 Sept 1(9):1–8. 53. Leiserowitz AA. American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Analysis: An Interna- tional Journal. 2005 Dec; 25(6):1433–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00690.x PMID: 16506973 54. Lorenzoni I, Pidgeon NF. Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic change. 2006 Jul 1; 77(1–2):73–95.

56. Milfont TL. The interplay between knowledge, perceived efficacy, and concern about global warming and climate change: a one-year longitudinal study. Risk Analysis: An International Journal. 2012 Jun; 32(6):1003–20. 57. Whitmarsh L. Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. Journal of risk research. 2008 Apr 1; 11 (3):351–74. 58. Price JC, Walker IA, Boschetti F. Measuring cultural values and beliefs about environment to identify their role in climate change responses. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2014 Mar 1; 37:8–20. 59. McCright AM. The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population and Environment. 2010 Sep 1; 32(1):66–87. 60. McCright AM, Dunlap RE. Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change. 2011 June 28; 21(4):1163–1172. 61. Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A. Global warming’s six Americas 2009: An audience seg- mentation analysis. 2009 May 20; Available from http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/wp-content/ uploads/2016/02/2009_05_Global-Warmings-Six-Americas.pdf 62. Hrynowski Z. Several issues tie as most important in 2020 elections. 2020 Jan 13 [cited 16 June 2020]. In: Gallup [Internet]. [about 15 screens]. Available from https://news.gallup.com/poll/276932/several- issues-tie-important-2020-election.aspx 63. Miniard D, Kantenbacher J, Attari SZ. Shared vision for a decarbonized future energy system in the

United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020 Feb 19; 117(13):7108–7114. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920558117 PMID: 32179682 64. Englehardt JD, Wu T, Bloetscher F, Deng Y, Du Pisani P, Eilert S, et al. Net-zero water management: Achieving energy-positive municipal water supply. Environmental science: Water Research & Technol- ogy. 2016; 2(2):250–60. 65. Herek GM. Beyond “homophobia”: Thinking more clearly about stigma, prejudice, and sexual orienta- tion. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 2015 Sep; 85(5S):S29. 66. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes. 1991 Dec 1; 50(2):179–211. 67. Longnecker N. An integrated model of science communication—More than providing evidence. Journal of Science Communication. 2016 Sep 21; 15(5):Y01. 68. Carley S, Krause RM, Lane BW, Graham JD. Intent to purchase a plug-in electric vehicle: A survey of early impressions in large US cites. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2013 Jan 1; 18:39–45. 69. Morton C, Anable J, Nelson JD. Consumer structure in the emerging market for electric vehicles: Identi- fying market segments using cluster analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 2017 Jul 3; 11(6):443–59. 70. Plo¨tz P, Schneider U, Globisch J, Du¨ tschke E. Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2014 Sep 1; 67:96–109. 71. Fulton L, Lah O, Cuenot F. Transport pathways for light duty vehicles: towards a 2 scenario. Sustainabil-

ity. 2013 May; 5(5):1863–74. 72. Fletcher J, Longnecker N, Higham J. Envisioning future travel: Moving from high to low carbon systems. Futures. 2019 May 1; 109:63–72. 73. Braman D, Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith HC, Tarantola T, Silva CL. Geoengineering and the science com- munication environment: a cross-cultural experiment. GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works. 2012; 199. [Internet] Available from https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications/199 74. Borick C, Rabe B. Americans cool on geoengineering approaches to addressing climate change. Issues in Governance Studies. 2012; 46(4):7. PLOS ONE Climate change risk perception in the USA and alignment with sustainable travel behaviours PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244545 February 3, 2021 17 / 17