Climate change risk perception in the USA and alignment with sustainable travel behaviours

8. Jones C, Hine DW, Marks AD. The future is now: reducing psychological distance to increase public engagement with climate change. Risk Analysis. 2017 Feb; 37(2):331–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa. 12601 PMID: 26989845 9. Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N. The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis: An International Journal. 2012 Jun; 32(6):957–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x PMID: 21992607 10. Singh AS, Zwickle A, Bruskotter JT, Wilson R. The perceived psychological distance of climate change impacts and its influence on support for adaptation policy. Environmental Science & Policy. 2017 Jul 1; 73:93–9. 11. McDonald RI, Chai HY, Newell BR. Personal experience and the ‘psychological distance’ of climate change: An integrative review. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2015 Dec 1; 44:109–18. 12. Rickard LN, Yang ZJ, Schuldt JP. Here and now, there and then: How “departure dates” influence cli- mate change engagement. Global Environmental Change. 2016 May 1; 38:97–107. 13. Trope Y, Liberman N. Construal-level theory of phychological distance. Psychological review. 2010 Apr; 17(2):440–463. 14. Somanader T. President Obama: The United States formally enters the Paris Agreement. 2016 Sep- tember 3 [cited 20 January 2020]. In: The White House President Barack Obama [Internet]. [about 5 screens]. Available from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/09/03/president-obama- united-states-formally-enters-paris-agreement 15. Trope Y, Liberman N. Temporal construal. Psychological review. 2003 Jul; 110(3):403. https://doi.org/

10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.403 PMID: 12885109 16. Bru¨gger A, Morton T, & Dessai S. “Proximising” climate change reconsidered: A construal level theory perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2016 Apr; 46:125–142. 17. Carmi N, Bartal E. Perception of environmental threat in the shadow of war: The effect of future orienta- tion. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal. 2014 May 4; 20(3):872–86. 18. Sharot T. The optimism bias. Current biology. 2011 Dec 6; 21(23):R941–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cub.2011.10.030 PMID: 22153158 19. Tonn B, Hemrick A, Conrad F. Cognitive representations of the future: Survey results. Futures. 2006 Sep 1; 38(7):810–29. 20. D’Argembeau A, Van der Linden M. Phenomenal characteristics associated with projecting oneself back into the past and forward into the future: Influence of valence and temporal distance. Conscious- ness and cognition. 2004 Dec 1; 13(4):844–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2004.07.007 PMID: 15522635 21. Addis DR, Wong AT, Schacter DL. Age-related changes in the episodic simulation of future events. Psy- chological science. 2008 Jan; 19(1):33–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02043.x PMID: 18181789 22. D’Argembeau A, Van der Linden M. Individual differences in the phenomenology of mental time travel: The effect of vivid visual imagery and emotion regulation strategies. Consciousness and cognition. 2006 Jun 1; 15(2):342–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.09.001 PMID: 16230028

23. Sheppard SR, Shaw A, Flanders D, Burch S, Wiek A, Carmichael J, et al. Future visioning of local cli- mate change: a framework for community engagement and planning with scenarios and visualisation. Futures. 2011 May 1; 43(4):400–12. 24. Newby-Clark IR, Ross M. Conceiving the past and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2003 Jul; 29(7):807–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029007001 PMID: 15018670 25. McElwee RO, Brittain L. Optimism for the world’s future versus the personal future: Application to envi- ronmental attitudes. Current Psychology. 2009 Jun 1; 28(2):133–45. 26. Marlon J, Howe P, Mildenberger M, Leiserowitz A, Wang X. Yale Climate Opinion Maps 2019. 2019 Sep 1 [cited 2 February 2020]. In: Yale program on Climate Change Communication [Internet]. [about 7 screens]. Available from https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/visualizations-data/ycom-us/ 27. Harre´ N. Psychology for a better world: Working with people to save the planet. Auckland University Press; 2018 May 10. 28. Eastin J, Grundmann R, Prakash A. The two limits debates: “Limits to Growth” and climate change. Futures. 2011 Feb 1; 43(1):16–26. 29. Pew Research Center. The politics of climate. 2016 Oct 4 [cited 2 February 2020] [Internet] Available from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2016/10/PS_2016.10.04_ Politics-of-Climate_FINAL.pdf PLOS ONE Climate change risk perception in the USA and alignment with sustainable travel behaviours PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244545 February 3, 2021 15 / 17