Climate smart agriculture and global food-crop production
pmc-PMC7190105.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 19 trang
It is in this environment that the concept of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) has become increasingly relevant. CSA proposes a framework that supports decision-making in the agri- culture sector by considering three foundational outcomes and by fully accounting for the trade-offs and synergies among them. It is comprised of agricultural systems that contribute to sustainable and equitable increases in agricultural productivity and incomes; greater adapta- tion and resilience to climate change of food systems from the farm- to the national-level; and reduction, or removal, of greenhouse gas emissions, where possible [16]. Many operational aspects of CSA are still under investigation as local contexts determine the enabling environment as well as the trade-offs and synergies between productivity, adapta- tion, and mitigation [17,18]. Farmers must identify what can be considered climate-smart given their biophysical, agricultural, and socio-economic context. As a consequence, the use of the CSA approach is knowledge-intensive and can require considerable institutional support [19,20]. Because of these difficulties, Chandra at al [21] note that, at this time, CSA is “a popu- lar scholarly solution” experiencing difficulties in translating into smallholder farmer and civil society actions as well as new policy directions. Taylor [22] illustrates how the failure to incor- porate issues related to social justice make the acceptance and implementation of CSA difficult in many communities. The frequent result is that, even when farmers, agrarian organizations,
large scale farmers, and policy maker have embraced the concept of CSA, they struggle with the implementation and tend to look for simple protocols to follow. Despite these unsettled issues, a substantial amount of resources have been mobilized to promote and implement CSA at a scale sufficient to have a global impact [23]. Even though CSA is more than a set of agricultural practices, it does include some specific technologies and agronomic tools, and these are the focus of this study. Our goal is to provide a first set of boundaries for the global effects of CSA used in food-crop production with a particular atten- tion to its potential to reduce GHG emissions without jeopardizing food security. For this, we focus on some aspects of food-crop production that can be modelled globally with a reasonable level of accuracy given the latest developments in modeling capabilities [9,24–26]. Our analysis looks at four major categories of agricultural practices: no-till, integrated soil fertility management, nitrogen use efficiency and alternate wetting and dry. They have been shown to have positive impacts on yields and GHG mitigation across a wide range of condi- tions, but they all require specific modifications and adjustments on the ground. As a conse- quence, the modelling work presented here is a stylized representation of a range of many technologies and practices that would be identified using the CSA approach. Notwithstanding these limitations, the results of our analysis clearly indicate that CSA prac-
tices have the potential to increase food production under unfavorable climate regimes and to improve the food security conditions of millions of people while reducing GHG emissions. However, results also indicate that for CSA to make a sufficiently large impact on global GHG emissions, it must be implemented widely across the entire sector and requires a significant amount of support and coordination. Our findings are also suggestive of broader benefits related to the resilience of the production system, to a reduced pressure for expanding crop- land area and to reduced soil fertility depletion. While encouraging, these results are the prod- uct of the method and of the modeling assumptions used in the analysis and they must be evaluated and refined by additional global and regional analyses. 2 Methods We performed an ex-ante analysis of the long-term effects on global food security and GHG emissions of adopting of a set of CSA technologies and practices to grow three widely grown crops: maize (Zea mays), wheat (Triticum aestivum), and rice (Oryza sativa). These three crops PLOS ONE Climate smart agriculture and global food-crop production PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231764 April 29, 2020 2 / 19 Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.