Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone?
pmc-PMC7815106.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 15 trang
57. Martin A, Blowers A, Boersema J. Paying for environmental services: can we afford to lose a cultural basis for conservation?: Taylor & Francis; 2008. 58. Vatn A. An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological economics. 2010; 69(6):1245–52. 59. Rode J, Go´ mez-Baggethun E, Krause T. Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: A review of the empirical evidence. Ecological Economics. 2015; 117:270–82. 60. Narloch U, Pascual U, Drucker AG. Collective action dynamics under external rewards: experimental insights from Andean farming communities. World Development. 2012; 40(10):2096–107. 61. Becerra TA, Engle DM, Elmore RD, Fuhlendorf SD. Contrasting preference for grassland landscapes among population groups in the central and southern Great Plains. Rangeland Ecology and Manage- ment. 2013; 66(5):529–38. 62. Howley P. Landscape aesthetics: Assessing the general publics’ preferences towards rural landscapes. Ecological Economics. 2011; 72:161–9. 63. Lo´ pez-Santiago CA, Oteros-Rozas E, Martı´n-Lo´ pez B, Plieninger T, Martı´n EG, A. Gonza´lez J. Using visual stimuli to explore the social perceptions of ecosystem services in cultural landscapes: the case of transhumance in Mediterranean Spain. Ecology and Society. 2014; 19(2). 64. Pastorella F, Giacovelli G, De Meo I, Paletto A. People’s preferences for Alpine forest landscapes: results of an internet-based survey. Journal of Forest Research. 2017; 22(1):36–43. 65. Pate J, Loomis J. The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and
salmon in California. Ecological Economics. 1997; 20(3):199–207. 66. Sutherland RJ, Walsh RG. Effect of distance on the preservation value of water quality. Land Econom- ics. 1985; 61(3):281–91. 67. Hein L, Van Koppen K, De Groot RS, Van Ierland EC. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological economics. 2006; 57(2):209–28. 68. Dallimer M, Jacobsen JB, Lundhede TH, Takkis K, Giergiczny M, Thorsen BJ. Patriotic values for public goods: transnational trade-offs for biodiversity and ecosystem services? Bioscience. 2015; 65(1):33– 42. 69. Ojea E, Loureiro ML. Altruistic, egoistic and biospheric values in willingness to pay (WTP) for wildlife. Ecological Economics. 2007; 63(4):807–14. 70. Hansla A, Gamble A, Juliusson A, Ga¨ rling T. The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations. Journal of environmental psychology. 2008; 28(1):1–9. 71. von Do¨ hren P, Haase D. Ecosystem disservices research: A review of the state of the art with a focus on cities. Ecological Indicators. 2015; 52:490–7. 72. Limburg KE, Luzadis VA, Ramsey M, Schulz KL, Mayer CM. The good, the bad, and the algae: Perceiv- ing ecosystem services and disservices generated by zebra and quagga mussels. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 2010; 36(1):86–92. PLOS ONE Values and attitudes towards biodiversity and ecosystem service goals of restoration PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245074 January 19, 2021 14 / 15
73. Lyytima¨ ki J, Sipila¨ M. Hopping on one leg–The challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2009; 8(4):309–15. 74. Sagie H, Morris A, Rofè Y, Orenstein DE, Groner E. Cross-cultural perceptions of ecosystem services: A social inquiry on both sides of the Israeli–Jordanian border of the Southern Arava Valley Desert. Jour- nal of Arid Environments. 2013; 97:38–48. 75. Lapointe M, Cumming GS, Gurney GG. Comparing ecosystem service preferences between urban and rural dwellers. BioScience. 2019; 69(2):108–16. 76. Larson KL, Corley EA, Andrade R, Hall SJ, York AM, Meerow S, et al. Subjective evaluations of ecosys- tem services and disservices. Ecology and Society. 2019; 24(2). 77. Olivero-Lora S, Mele´ ndez-Ackerman E, Santiago L, Santiago-Bartolomei R, Garcı´a-Montiel D. Attitudes toward Residential Trees and Awareness of Tree Services and Disservices in a Tropical City. Sustain- ability. 2020; 12(1):117. 78. Baur JW, Tynon JF, Ries P, Rosenberger RS. Urban Parks and Attitudes about Ecosystem Services: Does Park Use Matter? Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 2014; 32(4). 79. Shin YH, Moon H, Jung SE, Severt K. The effect of environmental values and attitudes on consumer willingness to pay more for organic menus: A value-attitude-behavior approach. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 2017; 33:113–21. 80. Diekmann A, Preisendo¨rfer P. Green and greenback: The behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society. 2003; 15(4):441–72.
81. Dallimer M, Tinch D, Hanley N, Irvine KN, Rouquette JR, Warren PH, et al. Quantifying preferences for the natural world using monetary and nonmonetary assessments of value. Conservation Biology. 2014; 28(2):404–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12215 PMID: 24372643 82. Martı´n-Lo´pez B, Go´mez-Baggethun E, Garcı´a-Llorente M, Montes C. Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecological Indicators. 2014; 37:220–8. 83. van Riper CJ, Kyle GT, Sherrouse BC, Bagstad KJ, Sutton SG. Toward an integrated understanding of perceived biodiversity values and environmental conditions in a national park. Ecological Indicators. 2017; 72:278–87. PLOS ONE Values and attitudes towards biodiversity and ecosystem service goals of restoration PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245074 January 19, 2021 15 / 15