Thông tin tài nguyên

Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone?

pmc-PMC7815106.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 15 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 13 · Đoạn 36Vị trí nguồn

21. Hurst M, Dittmar H, Bond R, Kasser T. The relationship between materialistic values and environmental attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2013; 36:257–69. 22. Milfont TL, Richter I, Sibley CG, Wilson MS, Fischer R. Environmental consequences of the desire to dominate and be superior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2013; 39(9):1127–38. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0146167213490805 PMID: 23798371 23. Stokols D. Instrumental and spiritual views of people-environment relations. American Psychologist. 1990; 45(5):641. 24. Stern PC. New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behav- ior. Journal of social issues. 2000; 56(3):407–24. 25. Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel T, Guagnano GA, Kalof L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human ecology review. 1999:81–97. 26. Fulton DC, Manfredo MJ, Lipscomb J. Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach. Human dimensions of wildlife. 1996; 1(2):24–47. 27. Homer PM, Kahle LR. A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Per- sonality and social Psychology. 1988; 54(4):638. 28. Milfont TL, Duckitt J. The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of environmental psychology. 2010; 30(1):80–94. 29. Shackleton CM, Ruwanza S, Sanni GS, Bennett S, De Lacy P, Modipa R, et al. Unpacking Pandora’s

Trang 13 · Đoạn 37Vị trí nguồn

box: understanding and categorising ecosystem disservices for environmental management and human wellbeing. Ecosystems. 2016; 19(4):587–600. 30. Willott E. Restoring nature, without mosquitoes? Restoration Ecology. 2004; 12(2):147–53. 31. Buckley MC, Crone EE. Negative Off-Site Impacts of Ecological Restoration: Understanding and Addressing the Conflict. Conservation Biology. 2008; 22(5):1118–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523- 1739.2008.01027.x PMID: 18759779 32. Vining J, Tyler E, Kweon B-S. Public values, opinions, and emotions in restoration controversies. In: Gobster PH, Hull RB, editors. Restoring nature: perspectives from the social sciences and humanities. Washington, D.C.: Island Press; 2000. p. 143–61. 33. Buijs AE. Public support for river restoration. A mixed-method study into local residents’ support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch floodplains. Journal of Environ- mental management. 2009; 90(8):2680–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.02.006 PMID: 19303194 34. Nassauer JI. Monitoring the success of metropolitan wetland restorations: cultural sustainability and ecological function. Wetlands. 2004; 24(4):756–65. 35. Treves A, NAUGHTON-TREVES L, Shelley V. Longitudinal analysis of attitudes toward wolves. Con- servation Biology. 2013; 27(2):315–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12009 PMID: 23293913 36. Venkatachalam L. The contingent valuation method: a review. Environmental impact assessment review. 2004; 24(1):89–124.

Trang 13 · Đoạn 38Vị trí nguồn

37. Dietz T, Fitzgerald A, Shwom R. Environmental values. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2005; 30:335–72. 38. Brown TC. The concept of value in resource allocation. Land economics. 1984; 60(3):231–46. 39. Spash CL, Urama K, Burton R, Kenyon W, Shannon P, Hill G. Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: Economics, ethics and social psychology. Ecological Eco- nomics. 2009; 68(4):955–64. 40. Seymour E, Curtis A, Pannell D, Allan C, Roberts A. Understanding the role of assigned values in natu- ral resource management. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management. 2010; 17(3):142–53. 41. Ives CD, Kendal D. The role of social values in the management of ecological systems. Journal of envi- ronmental management. 2014; 144:67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013 PMID: 24921963 42. Bengston DN, Fan DP. Roads on the US national forests: An analysis of public attitudes, beliefs, and values expressed in the news media. Environment and Behavior. 1999; 31(4):514–39. 43. Layden PC, Manfredo MJ, Tucker P. Integrating public values toward wildlife into land use planning: A case study in La Plata County, Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 2003:174–84. 44. Trainor SF. Realms of value: Conflicting natural resource values and incommensurability. Environmen- tal Values. 2006:3–29. 45. Bolderdijk JW, Steg L, Geller ES, Lehman P, Postmes T. Comparing the effectiveness of monetary ver- sus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature Climate Change. 2013; 3(4):413–6.

Trang 13 · Đoạn 39Vị trí nguồn

46. Bright AD, Manfredo MJ, Fulton DC. Segmenting the public: An application of value orientations to wild- life planning in Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 2000:218–26. PLOS ONE Values and attitudes towards biodiversity and ecosystem service goals of restoration PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245074 January 19, 2021 13 / 15