One hundred years of climate change in Mexico

64. Liverman DM (1990) Drought impacts in Mexico: climate, agriculture, technology, and land tenure in Sonora and Puebla. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 80: 49–72. 65. Magaña V, Conde C, Sa´ nchez O, Gay C (2000) Evaluacio´ n de escenarios regionales de clima actual y de cambio clima´tico futuro para Me´xico. In: Me´ xico: Una visio´n hacia el siglo XXI. El cambio clima´tico en Me´xico. Me´xico D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Ecologı´a. pp. 15–21. 66. Weltzin JF, Loik ME, Schwinning S, Williams DG, Fay PA, et al. (2003) Assessing the response of ter- restrial ecosystems to potential changes in precipitation. AIBS Bulletin 53: 941–952. 67. Challenger A, Dirzo R, Lo´ pez JC, Mendoza E, Lira-Noriega A, et al. (2009) Factores de cambio y estado de la biodiversidad. Capital natural de Me´ xico 2: 37–73. 68. Go´mez Mendoza L, Arriaga L (2007) Modeling the effect of climate change on the distribution of oak and pine species of Mexico. Conservation Biology 21: 1545–1555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739. 2007.00814.x PMID: 18173478 69. Ponce-Reyes R, Reynoso-Rosales V-H, Watson JE, VanDerWal J, Fuller RA, et al. (2012) Vulnerability of cloud forest reserves in Mexico to climate change. Nature Climate Change 2: 448–452. 70. Olson DM, Dinerstein E (1998) The Global 200: A representation approach to conserving the Earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conservation Biology 12: 502–515. 71. Te´ llez-Valde´ s O, Da´ vila-Aranda P, Lira-Saade R (2006) The effects of climate change on the long-term

conservation of Fagus grandifolia var. mexicana, an important species of the cloud forest in eastern Mexico. Biodiversity & Conservation 15: 1095–1107. 72. Shaver GR, Canadell J, Chapin FS, Gurevitch J, Harte J, et al. (2000) Global warming and terrestrial ecosystems: A conceptual framework for analysis: Ecosystem responses to global warming will be complex and varied. Ecosystem warming experiments hold great potential for providing insights on ways terrestrial ecosystems will respond to upcoming decades of climate change. Documentation of ini- tial conditions provides the context for understanding and predicting ecosystem responses. AIBS Bulle- tin 50: 871–882. 73. Comisio´ n Nacional del Agua-CONAGUA (2012). Servicio Meteorolo´ gico Nacional: 135 años de historia en Me´xico. http://www.senado.gob.mx/comisiones/recursos_hidraulicos/docs/doc22.pdf 74. Daly C. (2013). Descriptions of PRISM spatial climate datasets for the conterminous United States. PRISM Doc. http://prism.oregonstate.edu/documents/PRISM_datasets.pdf 75. Baker DJ, Hartley AJ, Butchart SH, Willis SG. (2016). Choice of baseline climate data impacts projected species’ responses to climate change. Global Change Biology 22: 2392–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/ gcb.13273 PMID: 26950769 76. Deblauwe V, Droissart V, Bose R, Sonke´ B, Blach-Overgaard A, et al. (2016) Remotely sensed temper- ature and precipitation data improve species distribution modeling in the tropics. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 25: 443–454. 77. Marchi M, Sinjur I, Bozzano M, Westergren M (2019) Evaluating WorldClim Version 1 (1961–1990) as

the baseline for sustainable use of forest and environmental responses in a changing climate. Sustain- ability 11: 3043. 78. Tang Y, Winkler JA, Viña A, Liu J, Zhang Y, et al. (2018) Uncertainty of future projections of species dis- tributions in mountainous regions. PloS One 13: 1. PLOS ONE Historical climate change in Mexico PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209808 July 16, 2020 19 / 19