Thông tin tài nguyên

Short text classification with machine learning in the social sciences: The case of climate change on Twitter

pmc-PMC10540966.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 26 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 24 · Đoạn 63Vị trí nguồn

23. Toupin R, Millerand F, Larivière V. Who tweets climate change papers? Investigating publics of research through users’ descriptions. PLoS ONE. 2022; 17(6):e0268999. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0268999 PMID: 35657791 24. Walter S, Lo¨ rcher I, Bru¨ggemann M. Scientific networks on Twitter: Analyzing scientists’ interactions in the climate change debate. Public Understanding of Science. 2019; 28(6):696–712. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0963662519844131 PMID: 31027461 25. Kural E, Dellmuth L, Gustafsson MT. International organizations and climate change adaptation: A new dataset for the social scientific study of adaptation, 1990–2017. PloS ONE. 2021; 16(9):e0257101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257101 PMID: 34506547 26. Dellmuth L, Gustafsson MT. Global adaptation governance: How intergovernmental organizations mainstream climate change adaptation. Climate Policy. 2021; 21(7):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14693062.2021.1927661 27. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, et al. SciKit-Learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2011; 12:2825–2830. 28. Chollet F, Go¨rner M, Gulli A, Moolayil J, Heaton J, Allaire JJ, et al. Keras; 2015. https://keras.io, accessed Apr. 2023. 29. Verhulst PF. Notice sur la loi que la population suit dans son accroissement. Correspondance Mathe´- matique et Physique. 1838; 10:113–126. 30. Zhang T, Oles FJ. Text categorization based on regularized linear classification methods. Information Retrieval. 2001; 4(1):5–31.

Trang 24 · Đoạn 64Vị trí nguồn

31. Aseervatham S, Gaussier E´ , Antoniadis A, Burlet M, Denneulin Y. Logistic regression and text classifi- cation. In: Gaussier E´ , Yvon F, editors. Textual Information Access: Statistical Model. John Wiley & Sons; 2012. p. 61–84. 32. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning. 1995; 20(3):273–297. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF00994018 33. Scho¨ lkopf B, Smola AJ, Bach F. Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Opti- mization, and Beyond. MIT Press; 2002. 34. Lampert CH. Kernel Methods in Computer Vision. Now Publishers Inc.; 2009. 35. Kwok SW, Carter C. Multiple decision trees. In: Shchter RD, Levitt TS, Kanal LN, Lemmer JF, editors. Machine Intelligence and Pattern Recognition. vol. 9. Elsevier; 1990. p. 327–335. 36. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning. 2001; 45(1):5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/ A:1010933404324 37. Bouaziz A, Dartigues-Pallez C, da Costa Pereira C, Precioso F, Lloret P. Short text classification using semantic random forest. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery; 2014. p. 288–299. 38. Wu Q, Ye Y, Zhang H, Ng MK, Ho SS. ForesTexter: An efficient random forest algorithm for imbalanced text categorization. Knowledge-Based Systems. 2014; 67:105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys. 2014.06.004 39. Quinlan JR. Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning. 1986; 1(1):81–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF00116251 40. Apte´ C, Damerau F, Weiss SM. Automated learning of decision rules for text categorization. ACM

Trang 24 · Đoạn 65Vị trí nguồn

Transactions on Information Systems. 1994; 12(3):233–251. https://doi.org/10.1145/183422.183423 41. Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning. 1996; 24(2):123–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF00058655 42. Weiss SM, Kulikowski CA. Computer Systems that Learn: Classification and Prediction Methods from Sta- tistics, Neural Nets, Machine Learning, and Expert Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.; 1991. 43. Masand B, Linoff G, Waltz D. Classifying news stories using memory based reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual International ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval; 1992. p. 59–65. 44. Trstenjak B, Mikac S, Donko D. KNN with TF-IDF based framework for text categorization. Procedia Engineering. 2014; 69:1356–1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.129 45. Domingos P, Pazzani M. Beyond independence: Conditions for the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Machine Learning; 1996. p. 105–112. 46. McCallum A, Nigam K. A comparison of event models for naive bayes text classification. In: Proceed- ings of the AAAI Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization. vol. 752; 1998. p. 41–48. 47. Tang B, Kay S, He H. Toward optimal feature selection in naive Bayes for text categorization. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 2016; 28(9):2508–2521. https://doi.org/10.1109/ TKDE.2016.2563436 PLOS ONE Short text classification with machine learning in the social sciences PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290762 September 29, 2023 24 / 26