Assessing the effects of agricultural intensification on natural habitats and biodiversity in Southern Amazonia

62. Scho¨nenberg R, Schaldach R, Lakes T, Go¨ pel J, Gollnow F. Inter- and transdisciplinary scenario con- struction to explore future land-use options in southern Amazonia. E&S 2017; 22(3). 63. Jasinski Ellen, Morton Douglas, and DeFries Ruth. Physical landscape correlates of the expansion of mechanized agriculture in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Earth Interactions 2005; Volume 9:1–18. 64. Arvor Damien, Margareth Meirelles, Dubreuil Vincent, Begue Agnes. Analyzing the agricultural transi- tion in Mato Grosso, Brazil, using satellite-derived indices. Applied Geography 2012; 32:702–13. 65. Wint W, Robinson T. Gridded livestock of the world 2007. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2007. 66. Srinivasan CS, Irz X, Shankar B. An assessment of the potential consumption impacts of WHO dietary norms in OECD countries. Food Policy 2006; 31(1):53–77. 67. Organization WH. Diet, nutrition, and the prevention of chronic diseases: Report of a joint WHO/FAO expert consultation. World Health Organization; 2003. 68. NatureServe BIa. Bird species distribution maps of the world. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International 2014. 69. IUCN. The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2014.1. IUCN 2014; 12:20. 70. IUCN SSC. IUCN Red List categories and criteria: Version 3.1. Prepared by the IUCN Species Survival Commission 2001. 71. Colwell RK, Lees DC. The mid-domain effect: Geometric constraints on the geography of species rich- ness. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2000; 15(2):70–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(99) 01767-x PMID: 10652559

72. Vale MM, Lorini ML, Cerqueira R. Neotropical wild cats susceptibility to climate change. Oecologia Australis 2015; 19(1). 73. Pimm SL, Russell GJ, Gittleman JL, Brooks TM. The future of biodiversity. Science 1995; 269 (5222):347–50. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.269.5222.347 PMID: 17841251 74. Alkemade R, van Oorschot M, Miles L, Nellemann C, Bakkenes M, Brink B ten. GLOBIO3: A frame- work to investigate options for reducing global terrestrial biodiversity loss. Ecosystems 2009; 12 (3):374–90. 75. Alkemade R, Reid RS, van den Berg M, Leeuw de J, Jeuken M. Assessing the impacts of livestock pro- duction on biodiversity in rangeland ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2013; 110(52):20900–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011013108 PMID: 22308313 76. Eaton DP, Santos SA, Santos MdCA, Lima JVB, Keuroghlian A. Rotational grazing of native pasture- lands in the Pantanal: An effective conservation tool. Tropical Conservation Science 2011; 4(1):39– 52. 77. Law F. 12.727, 17 October 2012. 78. Soares-Filho B, Rajão R, Macedo M, Carneiro A, Costa W, Coe M et al. Cracking Brazil’s forest code. Science 2014; 344(6182):363–4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246663 PMID: 24763575 79. Pereira PAA, Martha GB, Am Santana C, Alves E. The development of Brazilian agriculture: Future technological challenges and opportunities. Agriculture & Food Security 2012; 1(1):4. 80. Macedo MN, DeFries RS, Morton DC, Stickler CM, Galford GL, Shimabukuro YE. Decoupling of defor-

estation and soy production in the southern Amazon during the late 2000s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2012; 109(4):1341–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111374109 PMID: 22232692 81. Latawiec AE, Strassburg BBN, Valentim JF, Ramos F, Alves-Pinto HN. Intensification of cattle ranch- ing production systems: Socioeconomic and environmental synergies and risks in Brazil. Animal 2014; 8(8):1255–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114001566 PMID: 26263189 82. Arima EY, Barreto P, Arau´ jo E, Soares-Filho B. Public policies can reduce tropical deforestation: Les- sons and challenges from Brazil. Land Use Policy 2014; 41:465–73. 83. Ceddia MG, Bardsley NO, Gomez-y-Paloma S, Sedlacek S. Governance, agricultural intensification, and land sparing in tropical South America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2014; 111(20):7242–7. 84. Strassburg BBN, Latawiec AE, Barioni LG, Nobre CA, Da Silva VP, Valentim JF et al. When enough should be enough: Improving the use of current agricultural lands could meet production demands and spare natural habitats in Brazil. Global Environmental Change 2014; 28:84–97. 85. Sparovek G, Barretto AGdOP, Matsumoto M, Berndes G. Effects of Governance on Availability of Land for Agriculture and Conservation in Brazil. Environ Science & Technology 2015; 49(17):10285– 93. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01300 PMID: 26241204 86. Bento de Souza Ferreira Filho J, Ribera L, Horridge M. Deforestation Control and Agricultural Supply in Brazil. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2015; 97(2):589–601. PLOS ONE

Agricultural intensification effects on natural habitats and biodiversity PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225914 November 25, 2020 20 / 21