Thông tin tài nguyên

Assessing the effects of agricultural intensification on natural habitats and biodiversity in Southern Amazonia

pmc-PMC7688104.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 21 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 19 · Đoạn 53Vị trí nguồn

39. Biggs R, Simons H, Bakkenes M, Scholes RJ, Eickhout B, van Vuuren D et al. Scenarios of biodiversity loss in southern Africa in the 21st century. Global Environmental Change 2008; 18(2):296–309. 40. Koch J, Schaldach R, Go¨pel J. Can agricultural intensification help to conserve biodiversity? A sce- nario study for the African continent. J Environ Manage 2019; 247:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jenvman.2019.06.015 PMID: 31229783 41. Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockstro¨ m J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM et al. Sustainability. Plane- tary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 2015; 347 (6223):1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855 PMID: 25592418 42. Lamb EG, Bayne E, Holloway G, Schieck J, Boutin S, Herbers J et al. Indices for monitoring biodiver- sity change: Are some more effective than others? Ecological Indicators 2009; 9(3):432–44. 43. ROUGET M, COWLING RM, VLOK JAN, THOMPSON M, BALMFORD A. Getting the biodiversity intactness index right: The importance of habitat degradation data. Global Change Biology 2006; 12 (11):2032–6. 44. Spera SA, Galford GL, Coe MT, Macedo MN, Mustard JF. Land-use change affects water recycling in Brazil’s last agricultural frontier. Global Change Biology 2016; 22(10):3405–13. https://doi.org/10. 1111/gcb.13298 PMID: 27028754 45. Dias LCP, Pimenta FM, Santos AB, Costa MH, Ladle RJ. Patterns of land use, extensification, and intensification of Brazilian agriculture. Global Change Biology 2016; 22(8):2887–903. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/gcb.13314 PMID: 27170520

Trang 19 · Đoạn 54Vị trí nguồn

46. Estatı´stica IBdGe. Indicadores IBGE: Estatı´stica da Produc¸ão Agrı´cola: IBGE Rio de Janeiro; 2007. 47. Coy M, Klingler M. Pionierfronten im brasilianischen Amazonien zwischen alten Problemen und neuen Dynamiken. Das Beispiel des „Entwicklungskorridors “Cuiaba´ (Mato Grosso)–Santare´ m (Para´ ). Innsbrucker Jahresbericht 2008; 2010:109–29. 48. Friedl MA, Sulla-Menashe D, Tan B, Schneider A, Ramankutty N, Sibley A et al. MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets. Remote Sensing of Environment 2010; 114(1):168–82. 49. GROSSO M. AMAZON CATTLE FOOTPRINT: Greenpeace Brazil Paulo; 2009. 50. Barona E, Ramankutty N, Hyman G, Coomes OT. The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters 2010; 5(2):24002. 51. VanWey LK, Spera S, Sa de R, Mahr D, Mustard JF. Socioeconomic development and agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2013; 368(1619):20120168. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0168 PMID: 23610174 52. Spera SA, Cohn AS, VanWey LK, Mustard JF, Rudorff BF, Risso J et al. Recent cropping frequency, expansion, and abandonment in Mato Grosso, Brazil had selective land characteristics. Environmental Research Letters 2014; 9(6):64010. 53. Klink CA, Machado RB. Conservation of the Brazilian cerrado. Conservation Biology 2005; 19 (3):707–13. 54. Schaldach R, Alcamo J, Koch J, Ko¨ lking C, Lapola DM, Schu¨ngel J et al. An integrated approach to

Trang 19 · Đoạn 55Vị trí nguồn

modelling land-use change on continental and global scales. Environmental Modelling & Software 2011; 26(8):1041–51. 55. Lapola DM, Schaldach R, Alcamo J, Bondeau A, Msangi S, Priess JA et al. Impacts of climate change and the end of deforestation on land use in the Brazilian Legal Amazon. Earth Interactions 2011; 15 (16):1–29. 56. Go¨ pel J, Schu¨ ngel J, Schaldach R, Meurer KHE, Jungkunst HF, Franko U et al. Future land use and land cover in Southern Amazonia and resulting greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils. Regional Environmental Change 2018; 18(1):129–42. 57. Turner BL, Lambin EF, Reenberg A. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2007; 104(52):20666– 71. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704119104 PMID: 18093934 58. Go¨ pel J, Barros Viana Hissa de L, Schu¨ngel J, Schaldach R. Sensitivity assessment and evaluation of a spatially explicit land-use model for Southern Amazonia. Ecological Informatics 2018; 48:69–79. 59. Alcamo J. Scenarios as tools for international environmental assessment. European Environment Agency; 2001. (vol 5). 60. Alcamo J. Environmental futures: The practice of environmental scenario analysis. Elsevier; 2008. 61. Scho¨nenberg R, Boy J, Hartberger K, Schumann C, Guggenberger G, Siebold M et al. Experiences of inter-and transdisciplinary research–a trajectory of knowledge integration within a large research con- sortium. Erdkunde 2017:177–93. PLOS ONE Agricultural intensification effects on natural habitats and biodiversity

Trang 19 · Đoạn 56Vị trí nguồn

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225914 November 25, 2020 19 / 21