Effective implementation of the Sport Education Model in physical education: A meta-analysis of participant and intervention characteristics

PLOS One | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331228 October 16, 2025 16 / 17 8. Segovia Y, Gutiérrez D. Effect of a game-based high intensity interval training program on body composition in primary education: comparison of the Sport Education Model and traditional methodology. J Phys Educ Sport. 2020; 20(2): 791–9. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.02113 9. Perlman D. The influence of the Sport Education Model on amotivated students’ in-class physical activity. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2012;18(3):335–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x12450795 10. Iserbyt P, Ward P, Martens J. The influence of content knowledge on teaching and learning in traditional and sport education contexts: an explor- atory study. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy. 2015;21(5):539–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1050662 11. Bessa C, Hastie P, Ramos A, Mesquita I. What actually differs between traditional teaching and sport education in students’ learning outcomes? A critical systematic review. J Sports Sci Med. 2021;20(1):110–25. https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2021.110 PMID: 33707994 12. Kao C-C. Development of team cohesion and sustained collaboration skills with the Sport Education Model. Sustainability. 2019;11(8):2348. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su11082348 13. Wang B, Chen S. Sport education for social competence in K-12 physical education. Quest. 2021;73(4):391–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297 .2021.1986410 14. Bessa C, Hastie P, Rosado A, et al. Differences between sport education and traditional teaching in developing students’ engagement and respon-

sibility. J Phys Educ Sport. 2020;20(6):3536–45. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.06477 15. Liu L, Luo X, Wang Y. Student self-efficacy on personal and social responsibility within a Sport Education Model. Revista De Cercetare Si Interven- tie Sociala. 2021;72:236–47. https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.72.15 16. Perlman D, Goc Karp G. A self-determined perspective of the Sport Education Model. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy. 2010;15(4):401–18. https://doi. org/10.1080/17408980903535800 17. Manninen M, Campbell S. The effect of the Sport Education Model on basic needs, intrinsic motivation and prosocial attitudes: a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2021;28(1):78–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x211017938 18. Choi SM, Sum KWR, Wallhead TL, Leung FLE, Ha SCA, Sit HPC. Operationalizing physical literacy through sport education in a university physi- cal education program. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy. 2021;27(6):591–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1915266 19. Manninen M, Campbell S. The effect of the Sport Education Model on basic needs, intrinsic motivation and prosocial attitudes: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2022;28(1):78–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2019.1661948 20. Choi SM, Sum KWR, Leung FLE, Wallhead T, Morgan K, Milton D, et al. Effect of sport education on students’ perceived physical literacy, motiva- tion, and physical activity levels in university required physical education: a cluster-randomized trial. High Educ. 2020;81(6):1137–55. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10734-020-00603-5

21. Luna P, Guerrero J, Cejudo J. Improving adolescents’ subjective well-being, trait emotional intelligence and social anxiety through a programme based on the Sport Education Model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(10):1821. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101821 PMID: 31126004 22. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 PMID: 33782057 23. Amir-Behghadami M, Janati A. Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews. Emerg Med J. 2020;37(6):387. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209567 PMID: 32253195 24. Flemyng E, Moore TH, Boutron I, Higgins JP, Hróbjartsson A, Nejstgaard CH, et al. Using Risk of Bias 2 to assess results from randomised con- trolled trials: guidance from Cochrane. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023;28(4):260–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112102 PMID: 36693715 25. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919 PMID: 27733354 26. Schünemann HJ, Mustafa RA, Brozek J, Steingart KR, Leeflang M, Murad MH, et al. GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;122:129–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

jclinepi.2019.12.020 PMID: 32060007 27. Kovacs M, Goldston D. Cognitive and social cognitive development of depressed children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1991;30(3):388–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199105000-00006 PMID: 1711524 28. Zhao M, Lu X, Zhang Q, Zhao R, Wu B, Huang S, et al. Effects of exergames on student physical education learning in the context of the artificial intelligence era: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):7115. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57357-8 PMID: 38531948 29. Deng N, Soh KG, Abdullah BB, Huang D, Xu F, Bashir M, et al. Effects of plyometric training on health-related physical fitness in untrained partici- pants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):11272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61905-7 PMID: 38760392 30. Ramirez-Campillo R, Perez-Castilla A, Thapa RK, Afonso J, Clemente FM, Colado JC, et al. Effects of plyometric jump training on measures of physical fitness and sport-specific performance of water sports athletes: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med Open. 2022;8(1):108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-022-00502-2 PMID: 36036301 31. Deeks J J, Higgins J P T, Altman D G, et al. Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of inter- ventions. Wiley; 2019. pp. 241–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604.ch10 32. Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Special topics in statistics. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book series. 2008. pp. 481–529.

33. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186 PMID: 12111919