Thông tin tài nguyên

Conservation futures 2050: Developing future scenarios to explore potential socio-economic developments and their impact on biodiversity

pmc-PMC11637332.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 16 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 15 · Đoạn 44Vị trí nguồn

65. Wyse S, Wilmshurst J, Burns B, Perry G. New Zealand forest dynamics: a review of past and present vegetation responses to disturbance, and development of conceptual forest models. NZ J Ecol. 2018; 42: 87–106. https://doi.org/10.20417/nzjecol.42.18 66. Keegan L, White R, Macinnis-Ng C. Current knowledge and potential impacts of climate change on New Zealand’s biological heritage. NZ J Ecol. 2022; 46: 3467. https://doi.org/10.20417/nzjecol.46.10 67. Ausseil AGE, Daigneault AJ, Frame B, Teixeira EI. Towards an integrated assessment of climate and socio-economic change impacts and implications in New Zealand. Environmental Modelling & Soft- ware. 2019; 119: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.05.009 68. The Treasury, Ministry for the Environment. Ngā kōrero āhuarangi me te ōhanga: climate economic and fiscal assessment 2023. New Zealand Government; 2023 p. 98. Available: https://www.treasury.govt. nz/publications/climate-economic-fiscal-assessment/nga-koreroahuarangi-me-te-ohanga-2023 69. Arcaya M, Raker EJ, Waters MC. The social consequences of disasters: individual and community change. Annu Rev Sociol. 2020; 46: 671–691. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054827 70. Kannemeyer RL, Samarasinghe O, Awatere S. Climate change risks and adaptation tools for Aotearoa New Zealand’s cultural heritage. Manaaki Whenua—Landcare Research; 2023 Jun p. 75. Report No.: LC4302. 71. Ministerial Inquiry into Land Use in Tairāwhiti and Wairoa. Outrage to optimism: report of the Ministerial

Trang 15 · Đoạn 45Vị trí nguồn

Inquiry into land uses associated with the mobilisation of woody debris (including forestry slash) and sediment in Tairāwhiti/Gisborne District and Wairoa District. New Zealand: Ministerial Inquiry into Land Uses in Tairawhiti and Wairoa; 2023. Available: https://environment.govt.nz/what-government-is-doing/ areas-of-work/land/ministerial-inquiry-into-land-use/ 72. Moyano J, Dimarco RD, Paritsis J, Peterson T, Peltzer DA, Crawford KM, et al. Unintended conse- quences of planting native and non-native trees in treeless ecosystems to mitigate climate change. Journal of Ecology. 2024; 1365–2745.14300. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14300 73. Bennett NJ, Whitty TS, Finkbeiner E, Pittman J, Bassett H, Gelcich S, et al. Environmental stewardship: a conceptual review and analytical framework. Environmental Management. 2018; 61: 597–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2 PMID: 29387947 74. Brondı´zio ES, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Bates P, Carino J, Ferna´ndez-Llamazares A´ , Ferrari MF, et al. Locally based, regionally manifested, and globally relevant: indigenous and local knowledge, values, and practices for nature. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2021; 46: 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-environ-012220-012127 75. Dufour A. “Canada has a lot of unpaid bills”: $10B settlement reached in landmark First Nation treaty case. CBC News. 17 Jun 2023. Available: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/sudbury/indigenous- communities-first-nations-ontario-broken-promise-1.6880423. Accessed 5 Apr 2024.

Trang 15 · Đoạn 46Vị trí nguồn

76. Alston E, Crepelle A, Law W, Murtazashvili I. The chronic uncertainty of American Indian property rights. Journal of Institutional Economics. 2021; 17: 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000636 77. Wellauer K, Williams C, Brennan B. “The Australian community couldn’t comprehend what it was”: Why the Voice failed. ABC News. 15 Oct 2023. Available: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-16/why- the-voice-failed/102978962. Accessed 5 Apr 2024. 78. Stevens N, Bond WJ. A trillion trees: carbon capture or fuelling fires? Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2024; 39: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2023.09.015 PMID: 37845119 79. Brundu G, Pauchard A, Pysˇek P, Pergl J, Bindewald AM, Brunori A, et al. Global guidelines for the sus- tainable use of non-native trees to prevent tree invasions and mitigate their negative impacts. NB. 2020; 61: 65–116. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.61.58380 80. Schenuit F, Colvin R, Fridahl M, McMullin B, Reisinger A, Sanchez DL, et al. Carbon dioxide removal policy in the making: assessing developments in 9 OECD cases. Front Clim. 2021; 3: 638805. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.638805 81. Moyano J. Unintended consequences of planting native and non-native trees in treeless ecosystems to fight climate change. Journal of Ecology. 2024. 82. Spatz DR, Holmes ND, Will DJ, Hein S, Carter ZT, Fewster RM, et al. The global contribution of invasive vertebrate eradication as a key island restoration tool. Sci Rep. 2022; 12: 13391. https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41598-022-14982-5 PMID: 35948555

Trang 15 · Đoạn 47Vị trí nguồn

83. IPCC. Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Summary for policymakers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2021. 84. Lawrence J, Mackey B, Chiew F, Costello MJ, Hennessy K, Lansbury N, et al. Australasia. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2022. pp. 1581–1688. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844 PLOS ONE Conservation futures 2050 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311361 December 12, 2024 15 / 16