Conservation futures 2050: Developing future scenarios to explore potential socio-economic developments and their impact on biodiversity
pmc-PMC11637332.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 16 trang
References 1. Bonebrake TC, Guo F, Dingle C, Baker DM, Kitching RL, Ashton LA. Integrating proximal and horizon threats to biodiversity for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2019; 34: 781–788. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.04.001 PMID: 31130317 2. Norton DA, Young LM, Byrom AE, Clarkson BD, Lyver PO, McGlone MS, et al. How do we restore New Zealand’s biological heritage by 2050? Eco Management Restoration. 2016; 17: 170–179. https://doi. org/10.1111/emr.12230 3. Sutherland WJ, Fleishman E, Clout M, Gibbons DW, Lickorish F, Peck LS, et al. Ten years on: a review of the first global conservation horizon scan. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2019; 34: 139–153. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.12.003 PMID: 30611398 4. Wilson RS, Hardisty DJ, Epanchin-Niell RS, Runge MC, Cottingham KL, Urban DL, et al. A typology of time-scale mismatches and behavioral interventions to diagnose and solve conservation problems. Conservation Biology. 2016; 30: 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12632 PMID: 26390368 5. Hartig F, Drechsler M. The time horizon and its role in multiple species conservation planning. Biological Conservation. 2008; 141: 2625–2631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.028 6. Guerrero AM, McAllister RRJ, Corcoran J, Wilson KA. Scale mismatches, conservation planning, and the value of social-network analyses. Conservation Biology. 2013; 27: 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1523-1739.2012.01964.x PMID: 23305381 7. Finnoff D, Shogren JF, Leung B, Lodge D. Take a risk: preferring prevention over control of biological
invaders. Ecological Economics. 2007; 62: 216–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.025 8. Rout M, Reid J, Wallace KJ, Hall MM, Whitehead J. Voicing stakeholder visions for biodiversity indica- tors: a framework using content analysis. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 2021; 12: 100156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2021.100156 9. Dey CJ, Rego AI, Midwood JD, Koops MA. A review and meta-analysis of collaborative research prioriti- zation studies in ecology, biodiversity conservation and environmental science. Proc R Soc B. 2020; 287: 20200012. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.0012 PMID: 32183628 10. Balvanera P, Jacobs S, Nagendra H, O’Farrell P, Bridgewater P, Crouzat E, et al. The science-policy interface on ecosystems and people: challenges and opportunities. Ecosystems and People. 2020; 16: 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1819426 11. Hallegatte S. Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Global Environmental Change. 2009; 19: 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.12.003 12. Ednie G, Kapoor T, Koppel O, Piczak ML, Reid JL, Murdoch AD, et al. Foresight science in conserva- tion: tools, barriers, and mainstreaming opportunities. Ambio. 2023; 52: 411–424. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s13280-022-01786-0 PMID: 36287382 13. Sutherland WJ, Fleishman E, Mascia MB, Pretty J, Rudd MA. Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2011; 2: 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00083.x
14. Cook CN, Inayatullah S, Burgman MA, Sutherland WJ, Wintle BA. Strategic foresight: how planning for the unpredictable can improve environmental decision-making. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2014; 29: 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.07.005 PMID: 25097098 15. IPBES. The methodological assessment report on scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bonn, Germany: Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiver- sity and Ecosystem Services; 2016 p. 348. 16. Sutherland WJ. Predicting the ecological consequences of environmental change: a review of the meth- ods. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2006; 43: 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01182.x 17. Peterson GD, Cumming GS, Carpenter SR. Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology. 2003; 17: 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01491.x 18. AghaKouchak A, Chiang F, Huning LS, Love CA, Mallakpour I, Mazdiyasni O, et al. Climate extremes and compound hazards in a warming world. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 2020; 48: 519–548. https://doi. org/10.1146/annurev-earth-071719-055228 19. Clarke B, Otto F, Stuart-Smith R, Harrington L. Extreme weather impacts of climate change: an attribu- tion perspective. Environ Res: Climate. 2022; 1: 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ac6e7d 20. IPBES. Thematic assessment report on invasive alien species and their control of the Intergovernmen- tal Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Roy HE, Pauchard A, Stoett P,
Renard Truong T, editors. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany; 2023. https://doi.org/10.5281/ ZENODO.7430682 PLOS ONE Conservation futures 2050 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311361 December 12, 2024 12 / 16