Brazil nut journey under future climate change in Amazon

27. Eyring V, Bony S, Meehl GA, Senior CA, Stevens B, Stouffer RJ, et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci Model Dev. 2016; 9: 1937–1958. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016 28. O’Neill BC, Kriegler E, Ebi KL, Kemp-Benedict E, Riahi K, Rothman DS, et al. The roads ahead: Narra- tives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Global Environ- mental Change. 2017; 42: 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004 29. Riahi K, van Vuuren DP, Kriegler E, Edmonds J, O’Neill BC, Fujimori S, et al. The Shared Socioeco- nomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Global Environmental Change. 2017; 42: 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 30. Hijmans RJ, Phillips S, Leathwick J, Maintainer JE. Package “dismo” Type Package Title Species Distri- bution Modeling. 2017. 31. Robertson MP, Visser V, Hui C. Biogeo: An R package for assessing and improving data quality of occurrence record datasets. Ecography. 2016; 39: 394–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02118 32. Thuiller W, Lafourcade B, Engler R, Arau´ jo MB. BIOMOD—A platform for ensemble forecasting of spe- cies distributions. Ecography. 2009; 32: 369–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05742.x 33. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Viena: R Foundation for Statis- tical Computing; 2019.

34. Manel S, Dias JM, Ormerod SJ. Comparing discriminant analysis, neural networks and logistic regres- sion for predicting species distributions: A case study with a Himalayan river bird. Ecol Modell. 1999; 120: 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00113-1 35. Scull P, Franklin J, Chadwick OA. The application of classification tree analysis to soil type prediction in a desert landscape. Ecol Modell. 2005; 181: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.06.036 36. Hastie, Tibshirani—1986—Generalized Additive Models. 37. Friedman—1991—Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines. 38. Guisan A, Edwards TC, Hastie T. Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of spe- cies distributions: setting the scene. Ecol Modell. 2002; 157: 89–100. Available: www.elsevier.com/ locate/ecolmodel 39. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001; 45: 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 40. Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology. 2006; 43: 1223–1232. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x 41. Mcneil BJ, Hanley JA. Statistical Approaches to the Analysis of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves. Med Decis Making. 1984;4. 42. Garcı´a Molinos J, Schoeman DS, Brown CJ, Burrows MT. VoCC: An r package for calculating the velocity of climate change and related climatic metrics. Methods Ecol Evol. 2019; 10: 2195–2202. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13295

43. Peterson AT, Sobero´n J, Pearson RG, Anderson RP, Martı´nez-Meyer E, Nakamura M, et al. Ecological niches and geographic distributions. Choice Reviews Online. 2011. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE. 49-6266 44. Engler R, Hordijk W, Guisan A. The MIGCLIM R package—seamless integration of dispersal con- straints into projections of species distribution models. Ecography. 2012; 35: 872–878. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07608.x 45. McDowell NG, Allen CD. Darcy’s law predicts widespread forest mortality under climate warming. Nat Clim Chang. 2015; 5: 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2641 46. Rowland L, Da Costa ACL, Galbraith DR, Oliveira RS, Binks OJ, Oliveira AAR, et al. Death from drought in tropical forests is triggered by hydraulics not carbon starvation. Nature. 2015; 528: 119–122. https:// doi.org/10.1038/nature15539 PMID: 26595275 47. Marenco RA, Antezana-Vera SA, Dos Santos Gouvêa PR, Camargo MAB, De Oliveira MF, Da Silva Santos JK. Fisiologia de espe´ cies florestais da Amazoˆ nia: Fotossı´ntese, respirac¸ão e relac¸ões hı´dricas. Revista Ceres. 2014; 61: 786–799. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737X201461000004 48. Way DA, Oren R, Kroner Y. The space-time continuum: The effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on trees and the importance of scaling. Plant Cell and Environment. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2015. pp. 991–1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12527 PMID: 25737035 49. Jansen M, Guariguata MR, Chiriboga-Arroyo F, Quaedvlieg J, Vargas Quispe FM, Arroyo Quispe E,

et al. Forest Degradation and Inter-annual Tree Level Brazil Nut Production in the Peruvian Amazon. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. 2021; 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.525533 PLOS ONE Effects of climate change on Brazil nut PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312308 November 13, 2024 12 / 13