Demographic and genetic structure of a severely fragmented population of the endangered hog deer (Axis porcinus) in the Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot

43. Gaur A, Singh A, Arunabala V, Umapathy G, Shailaja K, Singh L. Development and characterization of 10 novel microsatellite markers from chital deer (Cervus axis) and their cross-amplification in other related species. Molecular Ecology Notes. 2003; 3:607–609. 44. Jones KC, Levine KF, Banks JD. Characterization of 11 polymorphic tetra-nucleotide microsatellites for forensic applications in California elk (Cervus elaphus canadensis). Molecular Ecology Notes. 2002; 2: 425–427. 45. Zhang Q, Ji YJ, Zeng ZG, Song YL, Zhang DX. Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers for the vulnera- ble Hainan Eld’s deer (Cervus eldi hainanus) in China. Acta Zoologica Sinica. 2005; 51:530–534. 46. Say L, Naulty F, Antoinette F, Hayden JT. Absence of heterozygote advantage in a population of fallow deer Dama dama L. Biological Letters. 2005; 42(1): 3–12. 47. DeYoung RW, Demarais S, Honeycutt RL, Rooney AP, Gonzales RA, Gee KL. Genetic consequences of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) restoration in Mississippi. Molecular Ecology. 2003; 12: 3237–325. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01996.x PMID: 14629342 48. Anderson JD, Honeycutt RL, Gonzales RA, Gee KL, Skow LC, Gallagher RL, et al. Development of microsatellite DNA markers for the automated genetic characterization of white-tailed deer populations. Journal of Wildlife Management. 2002; 66:67–74. 49. Poetsch M, Seefeldt S, Maschke M, Lignitz E. Analysis of microsatellite polymorphism in red deer, roe deer, and fallow deer: Possible employment in forensic applications. Forensic Science International.

2001; 116: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00337-6 PMID: 11118746 50. Coulson TN, Pemberton JM, Albon SD, Beaumont M, Marshall TC, Slate J, et al. Microsatellites reveal heterosis in red deer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 1998; B 265: 489–495. 51. Mittermeier RA, Robles GP, Hoffmann M, Pilgrim JD, Brooks TM, Mittermeier CG,et al. Hotspots revis- ited: Earth’s biologically richest and most endangered ecoregions. 2004; CEMEX, Mexico City. 52. Conservation International. The world’s 10 most threatened Hotspots. 2011; http://www.conservation. org. 53. Vishvanath N, Nanayakara RP, Herath HMJCB. Current status, distribution and conservation of the Sri Lankan hog deer Hyelaphus porcinus (Zimmermann, 1780) (Cetartiodactyla: Cervidae). Journal of Threatened Taxa. 2014; 6(12):6515–6522. 54. Arshad M, Ullah I, Chaudhry MJI, Khan NUH. Estimating hog deer Axis porcinus population in the river- ine forest of Taunsa Barrage Wildlife Sanctuary, Punjab, Pakistan. Records: Zoological Survey of Paki- stan. 2012; 21:25–28. 55. Khuraijam JS, Rajkumar R, Mayengbam J, Meiraba N. Wild boar, a new threat to the Manipur Brow-ant- lered deer—the Sangai. Zoo’s Print. 2011; 16(10): 3–4. 56. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 1996; 11(10):413–418. 57. Buza L, Young A, Thrall P. Genetic erosion, inbreeding and reduced fitness in fragmented populations of the endangered tetraploid pea Swainsona recta. Biological Conservation. 2000; 93(2):177–186.

58. Shea KL, Furnier GR. Genetic variation and population structure in central and isolated populations of balsam fir, Abies balsamea (Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany. 2002; 89(5):783–791. https://doi. org/10.3732/ajb.89.5.783 PMID: 21665678 59. Shaffer ML. Minimum population sizes for species conservation. Biosciences. 1981; 31:131–134. 60. Saccheri I, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature. 1998; 392:491–494. 61. Ayala FJ, Kiger JA Jr. Modern genetics, second edition. 1984; Benjamin Cummings, Davis. 62. Khater M, Salehi E, Gras R. Correlation between genetic diversity and fitness in a predator–prey eco- system simulation. In: Wang D, Reynolds M. (Eds.), Advances in artificial intelligence. 2011; Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg and New York. Pp. 422–431. 63. Yang J, Jiang ZG. Genetic diversity, population genetic structure and demographic history of Przewals- ki’s gazelle (Procapra przewalskii): implications for conservation. Conservation Genetics. 2011; 12:1457–1468. 64. Wu H, Hu J, Wan QH, Fang SG, Liu WH, Zhang SY. Microsatellite polymorphisms and population genetic structure of sika deer in China. Acta Theriologica Sinica. 2008; 28:109–116. 65. Hajji GM, Zachos FE, Charfi-Cheikrouha F, Hartl GB. Conservation genetics of the imperilled Barbary red deer in Tunisia. Animal Conservation. 2007; 10:229–235. 66. Pe´ rez-Espona S, Pe´ rez-Barberı´a FJ, Mcleod JE, Jiggins CD, Gordon IJ, Pemberton JM. Landscape

features affect gene flow of Scottish Highland red deer (Cervus elaphus). Molecular Ecology. 2008; 17:981–996. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03629.x PMID: 18261043 Demographic and genetic structure of hog deer in the Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210382 February 6, 2020 15 / 16