Thông tin tài nguyên

Social norms and climate-friendly behavior of adolescents

pmc-PMC9045838.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 16 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 15 · Đoạn 41Vị trí nguồn

ments to enhance tax compliance. J Public Econ. 2017; 148: 14–31. 31. Allcott H, Rogers T. The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evi- dence from energy conservation. Am Econ Rev. 2014; 104: 3003–3037. 32. Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol Sci. 2007; 18: 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9280.2007.01917.x PMID: 17576283 33. John P, Blume T. How best to nudge taxpayers? The impact of message simplification and descriptive social norms on payment rates in a central London local authority. J Behav Public Adm. 2018; 1. 34. Morris MW, Hong Y yi, Chiu C yue, Z. Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2015; 129: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp. 2015.03.001 35. Grimm P. Social Desirability Bias. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing. 2010. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02057 36. Lange F, Steinke A, Dewitte S. The Pro-Environmental Behavior Task: A laboratory measure of actual pro-environmental behavior. J Environ Psychol. 2018; 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.02.007 37. Chao Y-L, Lam S-P. Measuring Responsible Environmental Behavior: Self-Reported and Other- Reported Measures and Their Differences in Testing a Behavioral Model. Environ Behav. 2009; 43: 53– 71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509350849 38. Eby B, Carrico AR, Truelove HB. The influence of environmental identity labeling on the uptake of pro-

Trang 15 · Đoạn 42Vị trí nguồn

environmental behaviors. Clim Change. 2019; 155: 563–580. 39. Clements JM, McCright AM, Dietz T, Marquart-Pyatt ST. A behavioural measure of environmental deci- sion-making for social surveys. Environ Sociol. 2015; 1: 27–37. 40. Benz M, Meier S. Do people behave in experiments as in the field?—evidence from donations. Exp Econ. 2008; 11: 268–281. 41. Bicchieri C, Xiao E. Do the right thing: but only if others do so. J Behav Decis Mak. 2009; 22: 191–208. 42. Robert I, Arnab M. Is dishonesty contagious? Econ Inq. 2013; 51: 722–734. 43. Dimant E. Contagion of pro- and anti-social behavior among peers and the role of social proximity. J Econ Psychol. 2019; 73: 66–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.04.009 44. Ga¨chter S, Gerhards L, Nosenzo D. The importance of peers for compliance with norms of fair sharing. Eur Econ Rev. 2017; 97: 72–86. 45. Alpizar F, Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O. Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica. J Public Econ. 2008; 92: 1047–1060. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.11.004 46. Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V. A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate envi- ronmental conservation in hotels. J Consum Res. 2008; 35: 472–482. 47. Bicchieri C, Dimant E. Nudging with care: The risks and benefits of social information. Public Choice. 2019; 1–22. PLOS ONE Social norms and climate-friendly behavior of adolescents PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266847 April 27, 2022 15 / 16

Trang 16 · Đoạn 43Vị trí nguồn

48. Bicchieri C, Dimant E, Ga¨ chter S. Observability, social proximity, and the erosion of norm compliance. 2020. 49. Gino F, Shang J, Croson R. The impact of information from similar or different advisors on judgment. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2009; 108: 287–302. 50. Bicchieri C. Norms in the wild: How to diagnose, measure, and change social norms. Oxford University Press; 2016. 51. Kallgren CA, Reno RR, Cialdini RB. A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2000; 26: 1002–1012. 52. Angerer S, Gla¨tzle-Ru¨ tzler D, Lergetporer P, Sutter M. Donations, risk attitudes and time preferences: A study on altruism in primary school children. J Econ Behav Organ. 2015; 115: 67–74. 53. Fehr E, Bernhard H, Rockenbach B. Egalitarianism in young children. Nature. 2008; 454: 1079–1083. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07155 PMID: 18756249 54. Hermes H, Hett F, Mechtel M, Schmidt F, Schunk D, Wagner V. Do children cooperate conditionally? Adapting the strategy method for first-graders. J Econ Behav Organ. 2020; 179: 638–652. 55. Sutter M, Zoller C, Gla¨ tzle-Ru¨ tzler D. Economic behavior of children and adolescents–A first survey of experimental economics results. Eur Econ Rev. 2019; 111: 98–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. euroecorev.2018.09.004 56. Winklhofer U, Langmeyer A. Taschengeld als Beitrag zur Gelderziehung. Fru¨ he Kindheit, 18 Jg, H 4. 2017: 50–55. https://www.dji.de/fileadmin/user_upload/bibs2014/DJI_Expertise_Taschengeld.pdf

Trang 16 · Đoạn 44Vị trí nguồn

57. Krupka EL, Weber RA. Identifying social norms using coordination games: {W}hy does dictator game sharing vary? J Eur Econ Assoc. 2013; 11: 495–524. 58. Schultz PW. Inclusion with Nature: The Psychology Of Human-Nature Relations BT—Psychology of Sustainable Development. In: Schmuck P, Schultz WP, editors. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2002. pp. 61–78. 59. Zizzo DJ. Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Exp Econ. 2010; 13: 75–98. 60. Krumpal I. Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review. Qual Quant. 2013; 47: 2025–2047. 61. Jaswal VK, Neely LA. Adults don’t always know best: preschoolers use past reliability over age when learning new words. Psychol Sci. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01778.x PMID: 16984291 62. Rakoczy H, Hamann K, Warneken F, Tomasello M. Bigger knows better: Young children selectively learn rule games from adults rather than from peers. Br J Dev Psychol. 2010; 28: 785–798. https://doi. org/10.1348/026151009x479178 PMID: 21121467 63. Agerstro¨ m J, Carlsson R, Nicklasson L, Guntell L. Using descriptive social norms to increase charitable giving: The power of local norms. J Econ Psychol. 2016; 52: 147–153. 64. Kohlberg L. Essays on moral development: The psychology of moral development. Harper & Row; 1984. 65. Eisenberg-Berg N. Development of children’s prosocial moral judgment. Dev Psychol. 1979; 15: 128. 66. Stevenson KT, Nils Peterson M, Bondell HD. Developing a model of climate change behavior among

Trang 16 · Đoạn 45Vị trí nguồn

adolescents. Clim Change. 2018; 151: 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2313-0 PLOS ONE Social norms and climate-friendly behavior of adolescents PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266847 April 27, 2022 16 / 16