Optimizing learning outcomes in physical education: A comprehensive systematic review of hybrid pedagogical models integrated with the Sport Education Model

49. Gil-Arias A, Harvey S, Garcı´a-Herreros F, Gonza´ lez-Vı´llora S, Pra´xedes A, Moreno A. Effect of a hybr- id teaching games for understanding/sport education unit on elementary students’ self-determined moti- vation in physical education. European Physical Education Review. 2021; 27(2):366–83. https://doi. org/10.1177/1356336X20950174 50. Gouveia E´ R, Lizandra J, Martinho D V, Franc¸a C, Ihle A, Sarmento H, et al. The Impact of Different Pedagogical Models on Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity in Physical Education Classes. Chil- dren. 2022; 9(12):1790. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9121790 PMID: 36553234 51. Guijarro E., MacPhail A., Arias-Palencia N.M., & Gonza´ lez-Vı´llora S. (2021). Exploring Game Perf- ormance and Game Involvement: Effects of a Sport Education Season and a Combined Sport Educa- tion—Teaching Games for Understanding Unit. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0170 52. Hastie, P.A., & Buchanan, A.M. (2000). Teaching Responsibility Through Sport Education: Prospects of a Coalition. 53. Hastie P.A., & Curtner-Smith M.D. (2006). Influence of a Hybrid Sport Education—Teaching Games for Understanding Unit on One Teacher and His Students. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 11(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980500466813 54. Jia Z.-R.R. (2021). Effects of Teaching Games for Understanding Integrated Sport Education Model on College Students’ Football Cognitive Performance and Motor Skills. Revista de Cercetare și Intervenție Socială, 72, 274–287. https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.72.17

55. Lo´ pez-Lemus I., Del Villar F., Rodrı´guez-Gutie´ rrez A., Gonza´lez-Silva J., & Moreno A. (2023). Cou-ld the Hybridization of the SE/TGfU Pedagogical Models Be an Alternative for Learning Sports and P- romoting Health? School Context Study. Children, 10(877). https://doi.org/10.3390/children10050877 PMID: 37238425 56. Mesquita I., Farias C., & Hastie P. (2012). The Impact of a Hybrid Sport Education—Invasion Games Competence Model Soccer Unit on Students’ Decision Making, Skill Execution and Overall Game Per- form-ance. European Physical Education Review, 18(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1356336X12440027 57. Oliveros M., & Fernandez-Rio J. (2022). Pedagogical Models: Can They Make a Difference to Girls’ In- Class Physical Activity? Health Education Journal, 81(8), 913–925. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 00178969221128641 58. Pan Y.-H., Huang C.-H., & Hsu W.-T. (2023). A Comparison of the Learning Effects Between TGfU-SE and TGfU on Learning Motivation, Sport Enjoyment, Responsibility, and Game Performance in Ph-ysical Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1165064 PMID: 37519367 59. Quiñonero-Martı´nez A.L., Cifo-Izquierdo M.I., Sa´ nchez-Alcaraz Martı´nez B.J., & Go´mez-Ma´ rmol A. (2023). Effect of the Hybridization of Social and Personal Responsibility Model and Sport Education Model on Physical Fitness Status and Physical Activity Practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1273513 PMID: 37915524

60. Da Silva R.M.R.R., Farias C.F.G.G., Ramos A.G.A.A., & Mesquita I.M.R.R. (2022). A Novice Teac-her as Facilitator of Learning During a Hybrid Sport Education/Step-Game Approach Volleyball Seaso-n. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 21, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2022.153 PMID: 35719230 61. Stran M., Sinelnikov O., & Woodruff E. (2012). Pre-Service Teachers’ Experiences Implementing a Hybrid Curriculum: Sport Education and Teaching Games for Understanding. European Physical Educ- at-ion Review, 18(3), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X12450789 62. Wei C., Su R., & Hsu M. (2020). Effects of TPSR Integrated Sport Education Model on Football Less-on Students’ Responsibility and Exercise Self-Efficacy. Revista de Cercetare și Intervenție Socială, 71, 126–136. https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.71.8 63. Luoma J., & Martela F. (2021). A Dual-Processing View of Three Cognitive Strategies in Strategic De- cision Making: Intuition, Analytic Reasoning, and Reframing. Long Range Planning, 54(102065). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102065 64. Von Elm E., Altman D.G., Egger M., Pocock S.J., Gøtzsche P.C., & Vandenbroucke J.P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guide- lines for Reporting Observational Studies. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 85(11), 867–872. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.07.045120 PMID: 18038077 65. Guijarro E., MacPhail A., Gonza´lez-Vı´llora S., & Arias-Palencia N.M. (2021). Relationship Between Per-

sonal and Social Responsibility and the Roles Undertaken in Sport Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1123/JTPE.2019-0097 66. Pozo P., Grao-Cruces A., & Pe´ rez-Orda´ s R. (2018). Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility Mod- el-Based Programmes in Physical Education. European Physical Education Review, 24(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X16664749 PLOS ONE A systematic review of hybrid pedagogical models integrated with Sport Education Model PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311957 December 4, 2024 21 / 22