Optimizing learning outcomes in physical education: A comprehensive systematic review of hybrid pedagogical models integrated with the Sport Education Model

11. Barba-Martı´n R A, Bores-Garcı´a D, Hortigu¨ ela-Alcala´ D, Gonza´lez-Calvo G. The application of the tea- ching games for understanding in physical education: Systematic review of the last six years. Internatio- nal Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(9):3330. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph17093330 PMID: 32403272 12. Morales-Belando M T, Kirk D, Arias-Estero J L. A systematic review of Teaching Games for Understa- nding intervention studies from a practice-referenced perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2022; 93(4):670–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2021.1897066 PMID: 34705604 13. Gouveia E´ R, Gouveia B R, Marques A, Kliegel M, Rodrigues A J, Prudente J, et al. The effectiveness of a tactical games approach in the teaching of invasion games. Journal of Physical Education and Sport.2019; 19(3):962–70. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2019.s3139 14. Jarrett K, Harvey S. Similar, but not the same: Comparing the game-based approaches of Teaching Gam-es for Understanding (TGfU) and Game Sense. Ejournal de la Recherche sur l’intervention en E´ ducation Physique et Sportive. 2016; ( 39):24–43. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejrieps.900 15. Zhan P, Ward P, Li W, Sutherland S, Goodway J. Effects of play practice on teaching table tennis skills. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2012; 31(1):71–85. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.31.1.71 16. Gre´haigne J F, Wallian N, Godbout P. Tactical-decision learning model and students’ practices. Physi- cal Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2006; 11(3):297–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/

17408980500340869 17. Rivera-Pe´rez S, Fernandez-Rio J, Gallego D I. Effects of an 8-week cooperative learning intervention on physical education students’ task and self-approach goals, and emotional intelligence. International Jour-nal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(1):61. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph18010061 PMID: 33374777 18. McKenzie J E, Brennan S E, Ryan R E, Thomson H J, Johnston R V, Thomas J. Defining the criteria for including studies and how they will be grouped for the synthesis. In: Higgins J P T, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M J, et al., editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Inter- vent-ions. Wiley; 2019. p. 33–65. 19. Durlak J A, Weissberg R P, Dymnicki A B, Taylor R D, Schellinger K B. The impact of enhancing stud- ents’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Dev-elopment. 2011; 82(1):405–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x PMID: 21291449 20. Zimmerman B J. Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice. 2002; 41 (2):64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 21. Pienima¨ ki I. Scoping review: Teaching personal and social responsibility through physical activity (TPS- R-MODEL). 2019. https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/64838 22. Casey A. Models-based practice: Great white hope or white elephant? Physical Education and Sport Pe-dagogy. 2014; 19(1):18–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.726977 23. Metzler M W. Instructional models for physical education. 3rd ed. Routledge; 2011.

24. MacPhail A, Kirk D, Griffin L L. Throwing and catching as relational skills in game play: Situated learn- ing in a modified game unit. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2008; 27(2):100–15. https://doi. org/10.1123/jtpe.27.1.100 25. Casey A, MacPhail A. Adopting a models-based approach to teaching physical education. Physical Edu-cation and Sport Pedagogy. 2018; 23(3):294–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018. 1429588 26. Costa L. C. A. D., Nascimento J. V. D., & Vieira L. F. Teaching invasive team sports in the school envi- ronment: From theory to practice from the perspective of a hybrid model. Journal of Physical Education, 2016; 27, e2709. https://doi.org/10.4025/jphyseduc.v27i1.2709 27. Threatt A S, Simonton K L, Layne T E. Motivating students through content and curriculum models: Bu-ilding a Sport Education Tactical Games Model (SETGM) unit on Spikeball. Journal of Physical Educa-ti-on, Recreation & Dance. 2022; 93(4):31–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2022. 2100533 28. Alexander K, Penney D. Teaching under the influence: Feeding Games for Understanding into the Sport Education development-refinement cycle. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2005; 10 (3):287–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980500340901 29. Evangelio C, Ferna´ ndez-Rio J, Peiro´ -Velert C, Gonza´ lez-Vı´llora S. Sport education, cooperative lear- nin-g, and health-based physical education: Another step in pedagogical models’ hybridization. Journal of P-hysical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2021; 92(6):24–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084. 2021.1977739

30. Griffin J I, Butler L L, Sheppard M A. Athlete-centred coaching: Extending the possibilities of a holistic and process-oriented model to athlete development. Routledge; 2018. PLOS ONE A systematic review of hybrid pedagogical models integrated with Sport Education Model PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311957 December 4, 2024 19 / 22