Optimizing learning outcomes in physical education: A comprehensive systematic review of hybrid pedagogical models integrated with the Sport Education Model

model fidelity and expanding empirical support are essential for the effective development and implementation of these hybrid models. Supporting information S1 Table. Detailed search strategy. (DOC) S1 Checklist. PRISMA 2020 checklist. (PDF) S1 File. Numbering table. (XLS) Author Contributions Conceptualization: Junlong Zhang, Kim Geok Soh, Mohd Ashraff Mohd Anuar. Investigation: Junlong Zhang, Xiaorong Bai. Methodology: Kim Geok Soh, Mohd Ashraff Mohd Anuar. Supervision: Kim Geok Soh. Writing – original draft: Junlong Zhang. Writing – review & editing: Kim Geok Soh, Wensheng Xiao. References 1. Hastie P A, Casey A. Fidelity in models-based practice research in sport pedagogy: A guide for future in-vestigations. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2014; 33(3):422–31. https://doi.org/10. 1123/jtpe.2013-0141 2. Kirk D. Educational value and models-based practice in physical education. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2013; 45(9):973–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.785352 3. Shen Y, Shao W. Influence of hybrid pedagogical models on learning outcomes in physical education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(15):9673. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159673 PMID: 35955027 4. Garcı´a-Gonza´ lez L, Abo´s A´ , Diloy-Peña S, Gil-Arias A, Sevil-Serrano J. Can a hybrid sport education/ te-aching games for understanding volleyball unit be more effective in less motivated students? An examin-ation into a set of motivation-related variables. Sustainability. 2020; 12(15):6170. https://doi.

org/10.3390/su12156170 5. Bunker D, Thorpe R. A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Educ-ation. 1982; 18(1):5–8. 6. Siedentop D. Sport education: Quality PE through positive sport experiences. Champaign: Human Kineti-cs; 1994. 7. Hellison D. Teaching physical and social responsibility through physical activity just what is the system [J]. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2015, 83: 1–16. 8. Lo´ pez-Lemus I, Del Villar F, Rodrı´guez-Gutie´ rrez A, Gonza´ lez-Silva J, Moreno A. Could the hybridizati- on of the SE/TGfU pedagogical models be an alternative for learning sports and promoting health? Sch- ool context study. Children. 2023; 10(5):877. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10050877 PMID: 37238425 9. Bessa C, Hastie P, Ramos A, Mesquita I. What actually differs between traditional teaching and sport ed-ucation in students’ learning outcomes? A critical systematic review. Journal of Sports Science and Med-icine. 2021; 20(1):110–25. https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2021.110 PMID: 33707994 10. Casey A, Goodyear V A. Can cooperative learning achieve the four learning outcomes of physical educ- ation? A review of literature. Quest. 2015; 67(1):56–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2014. 984733 PLOS ONE A systematic review of hybrid pedagogical models integrated with Sport Education Model PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311957 December 4, 2024 18 / 22