MetaWorks: A flexible, scalable bioinformatic pipeline for high-throughput multi-marker biodiversity assessments

2. Hajibabaei M. The golden age of DNA metasystematics. Trends in genetics. 2012; 28: 535–537. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2012.08.001 PMID: 22951138 3. Taberlet P, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Brochmann C, Willerslev E. Towards next-generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Molecular ecology. 2012; 21: 2045–2050. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05470.x PMID: 22486824 4. Gilbert JA, Jansson JK, Knight R. The Earth Microbiome project: successes and aspirations. BMC biol- ogy. 2014; 12: 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-014-0069-1 PMID: 25184604 5. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive Bayesian Classifier for Rapid Assignment of rRNA Sequences into the New Bacterial Taxonomy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007; 73: 5261–5267. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00062-07 PMID: 17586664 6. Schu¨ ßler A. Glomales SSUrRNA gene diversity. New Phytologist. 1999; 144: 205–207. https://doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00526.x 7. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2003; 270: 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1098/ rspb.2002.2218 PMID: 12614582 8. James TY, Kauff F, Schoch CL, Matheny PB, Hofstetter V, Cox CJ, et al. Reconstructing the early evo- lution of Fungi using a six-gene phylogeny. Nature. 2006; 443: 818–822. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature05110 PMID: 17051209 9. Hibbett DS, Binder M, Bischoff JF, Blackwell M, Cannon PF, Eriksson OE, et al. A higher-level phyloge-

netic classification of the Fungi. Mycological Research. 2007; 111: 509–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. mycres.2007.03.004 PMID: 17572334 10. CBOL Plant Working Group, Hollingsworth PM, Forrest LL, Spouge JL, Hajibabaei M, Ratnasingham S, et al. A DNA barcode for land plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009; 106: 12794–12797. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905845106 PMID: 19666622 11. Schoch CL, Seifert KA, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Spouge JL, Levesque CA, et al. Nuclear ribosomal inter- nal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012; 109: 6241–6246. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117018109 PMID: 22454494 12. Zimmermann J, Abarca N, Enk N, Skibbe O, Kusber W-H, Jahn R. Taxonomic Reference Libraries for Environmental Barcoding: A Best Practice Example from Diatom Research. Schierwater B, editor. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e108793. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108793 PMID: 25265556 13. Sato Y, Miya M, Fukunaga T, Sado T, Iwasaki W. MitoFish and MiFish Pipeline: A Mitochondrial Genome Database of Fish with an Analysis Pipeline for Environmental DNA Metabarcoding. Kumar S, editor. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2018; 35: 1553–1555. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy074 PMID: 29668970 14. Ahmed M, Back MA, Prior T, Karssen G, Lawson R, Adams I, et al. Metabarcoding of soil nematodes: the importance of taxonomic coverage and availability of reference sequences in choosing suitable marker(s). MBMG. 2019; 3: e36408. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.3.36408

15. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nature Methods. 2016; 13: 581–583. https://doi.org/10. 1038/nmeth.3869 PMID: 27214047 16. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet C, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable, and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nature Biotechnology. 2019; 37: 852–857. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 PMID: 31341288 17. Drummond AJ, Newcomb RD, Buckley TR, Xie D, Dopheide A, Potter BC, et al. Evaluating a multigene environmental DNA approach for biodiversity assessment. GigaSci. 2015; 4: 46. https://doi.org/10. 1186/s13742-015-0086-1 PMID: 26445670 18. Edge TA, Baird DJ, Bilodeau G, Gagne´ N, Greer C, Konkin D, et al. The Ecobiomics project: Advancing metagenomics assessment of soil health and freshwater quality in Canada. Science of The Total Envi- ronment. 2020; 710: 135906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135906 PMID: 31926407 19. Bengtsson-Palme J, Ryberg M, Hartmann M, Branco S, Wang Z, Godhe A, et al. Improved software detection and extraction of ITS1 and ITS2 from ribosomal ITS sequences of fungi and other eukaryotes for analysis of environmental sequencing data. Bunce M, editor. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2013; 4: 914–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12073 20. Andu´ jar C, Creedy TJ, Arribas P, Lo´ pez H, Salces-Castellano A, Pe´ rez-Delgado A, et al. NUMT dump- ing: validated removal of nuclear pseudogenes from mitochondrial metabarcode data. Evolutionary

Biology; 2020 Jun. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.17.157347 PLOS ONE MetaWorks mult-marker bioinformatic pipeline PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274260 September 29, 2022 9 / 11