MetaWorks: A flexible, scalable bioinformatic pipeline for high-throughput multi-marker biodiversity assessments

21. Porter TM, Hajibabaei M. Profile hidden Markov model sequence analysis can help remove putative pseudogenes from DNA barcoding and metabarcoding datasets. BMC Bioinformatics. 2021; 22: 256. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04180-x PMID: 34011275 22. Song H, Buhay JE, Whiting MF, Crandall KA. Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified. PNAS. 2008; 105: 13486–13491. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803076105 PMID: 18757756 23. Moulton MJ, Song H, Whiting MF. Assessing the effects of primer specificity on eliminating numt coam- plification in DNA barcoding: a case study from Orthoptera (Arthropoda: Insecta): DNA BARCODING. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2010; 10: 615–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02823.x PMID: 21565066 24. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Holmes SP. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. The ISME Journal. 2017; 11: 2639–2643. https://doi.org/10.1038/ ismej.2017.119 PMID: 28731476 25. Glassman SI, Martiny JB. Ecological patterns are robust to use of exact sequence variants versus oper- ational taxonomic units. mSphere. 2018; 3: e00148–18. https://doi.org/10.1101/283283 26. Porter TM, Hajibabaei M. Putting COI Metabarcoding in Context: The Utility of Exact Sequence Variants (ESVs) in Biodiversity Analysis. Front Ecol Evol. 2020; 8: 248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00248 27. Porter TM, Gibson JF, Shokralla S, Baird DJ, Golding GB, Hajibabaei M. Rapid and accurate taxonomic

classification of insect (class Insecta) cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) DNA barcode sequences using a naïve Bayesian classifier. Mol Ecol Resour. 2014; 14: 929–942. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755- 0998.12240 28. Porter TM, Hajibabaei M. Automated high throughput animal CO1 metabarcode classification. Scientific Reports. 2018; 8: 4226. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22505-4 PMID: 29523803 29. Virgilio M, Backeljau T, Nevado B, De Meyer M. Comparative performances of DNA barcoding across insect orders. BMC bioinformatics. 2010; 11: 206. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-206 PMID: 20420717 30. Adamowicz SJ, Boatwright JS, Chain F, Fisher BL, Hogg ID, Leese F, et al. Trends in DNA barcoding and metabarcoding. Genome. 2019; 62: v–viii. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2019-0054 PMID: 30998119 31. Koster J, Rahmann S. Snakemake—a scalable bioinformatics workflow engine. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28: 2520–2522. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts480 PMID: 22908215 32. Anaconda. Anaconda Software Distribution. 2016. Available: https://anaconda.com. 33. Wratten L, Wilm A, Go¨ ke J. Reproducible, scalable, and shareable analysis pipelines with bioinformat- ics workflow managers. Nat Methods. 2021 [cited 24 Sep 2021]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021- 01254-9 PMID: 34556866 34. Ratnasingham S, Hebert PD. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org). Molecular ecology notes. 2007; 7: 355–364. 35. Cochrane G, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Takagi T, Sequence Database Collaboration IN. The International

Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration. Nucleic Acids Research. 2016; 44: D48–D50. https:// doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1323 PMID: 26657633 36. Rimet F, Gusev E, Kahlert M, Kelly MG, Kulikovskiy M, Maltsev Y, et al. Diat.barcode, an open-access curated barcode library for diatoms. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 15116. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019- 51500-6 PMID: 31641158 37. Iwasaki W, Fukunaga T, Isagozawa R, Yamada K, Maeda Y, Satoh TP, et al. MitoFish and MitoAnnota- tor: A Mitochondrial Genome Database of Fish with an Accurate and Automatic Annotation Pipeline. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2013; 30: 2531–2540. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst141 PMID: 23955518 38. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, et al. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Research. 2007; 35: 7188–7196. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm864 PMID: 17947321 39. Deshpande V, Wang Q, Greenfield P, Charleston M, Porras-Alfaro A, Kuske CR, et al. Fungal identifica- tion using a Bayesian classifier and the Warcup training set of internal transcribed spacer sequences. Mycologia. 2016; 108: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3852/14-293 PMID: 26553774 40. Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH, Larsson K-H, Alexander IJ, Eberhardt U, Erland S, et al. The UNITE data- base for molecular identification of fungi–recent updates and future perspectives. New Phytologist. 2010; 186: 281–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03160.x PMID: 20409185

41. Banchi E, Ametrano CG, Greco S, Stanković D, Muggia L, Pallavicini A. PLANiTS: a curated sequence reference dataset for plant ITS DNA metabarcoding. Database. 2020; 2020: baz155. https://doi.org/10. 1093/database/baz155 PMID: 32016319 PLOS ONE MetaWorks mult-marker bioinformatic pipeline PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274260 September 29, 2022 10 / 11