Cryptic biodiversity of freshwater fish species in Bangladesh

fishes of Bangladesh. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9382. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45379-6 PMID: 31253861 15. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 2003;270(1512):313–21. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218 PMID: 12614582 16. Lakra WS, Singh M, Goswami M, Gopalakrishnan A, Lal KK, Mohindra V, et al. DNA barcoding Indian freshwater fishes. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2016;27(6):4510–7. https://doi.org/10.31 09/19401736.2015.1101540 PMID: 26703324 17. Habib KA, Islam MJ, Sakib MN, Brishti PS, Neogi AK. DNA barcoding of reef-associated fishes of Saint Martin’s Island, Northern Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh. Ecol Evol. 2023;13(10):e10641. https://doi. org/10.1002/ece3.10641 PMID: 37877103 18. Habib KA, Neogi AK, Rahman M, Oh J, Lee Y-H, Kim C-G. DNA barcoding of brackish and marine water fishes and shellfishes of Sundarbans, the world’s largest mangrove ecosystem. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0255110. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255110 PMID: 34339426 19. Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR- based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques. 1991;10(4):506–13. PMID: 1867860 20. Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005;360(1462):1847–57. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1716 PMID: 16214743 21. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in

performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(4):772–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010 PMID: 23329690 22. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algo- rithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32(1):268–74. https://doi. org/10.1093/molbev/msu300 PMID: 25371430 23. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, et al. MrBayes 3.2: effi- cient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61(3):539–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029 PMID: 22357727 24. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA. Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phy- logenetics Using Tracer 1.7. Syst Biol. 2018;67(5):901–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032 PMID: 29718447 25. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(7):3022–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120 PMID: 33892491 26. Puillandre N, Brouillet S, Achaz G. ASAP: assemble species by automatic partitioning. Mol Ecol Resour. 2021;21(2):609–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13281 PMID: 33058550 27. Hossain MAR, Wahab MA, Belton B. The checklist of the riverine fishes of Bangladesh. FAN-Bangladesh. 2012;2: 29–39. 28. Ahmed MS, Chowdhury MMK, Nahar L. Molecular characterization of small indigenous fish spe- cies (SIS) of Bangladesh through DNA barcodes. Gene. 2019;684:53–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gene.2018.10.048 PMID: 30359742

29. Ahmed MS, Datta SK, Zhilik AA. Molecular diversity of freshwater fishes of Bangladesh assessed by DNA barcoding. Bangladesh J Zool. 2020;48(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjz.v48i1.47872

PLOS One | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318982 April 28, 2025 18 / 18 PLOS One Cryptic biodiversity of freshwater fish 30. Sultana N, Igawa T, Islam MM, Hasan M, Alam MS, Komaki S, et al. Inter- and intra-specific genetic divergence of Asian tiger frogs (genus Hoplobatrachus), with special reference to the population structure of H. tigerinus in Bangladesh. Genes Genet Syst. 2017;91(4):217–27. https://doi.org/10.1266/ ggs.16-00006 PMID: 27452042 31. Washburn BA, Cashner MF, Blanton RE. Small fish, large river: Surprisingly minimal genetic structure in a dispersal‐limited, habitat specialist fish. Ecol Evol. 2020;10(4):2253–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/ ece3.6064 32. Castro Paz FP, Batista J da S, Porto JIR. DNA barcodes of Rosy Tetras and allied species (Characiformes: Characidae: Hyphessobrycon) from the Brazilian Amazon basin. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e98603. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098603 PMID: 24878569 33. Hillis DM. Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1987;18(1):23–42. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.000323 34. Johns GC, Avise JC. A comparative summary of genetic distances in the vertebrates from the mito- chondrial cytochrome b gene. Mol Biol Evol. 1998;15(11):1481–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjour- nals.molbev.a025875 PMID: 12572611 35. Ward RD. DNA barcode divergence among species and genera of birds and fishes. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009;9(4):1077–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02541.x PMID: 21564845

36. Fouquet A, Gilles A, Vences M, Marty C, Blanc M, Gemmell NJ. Underestimation of species rich- ness in neotropical frogs revealed by mtDNA analyses. PLoS One. 2007;2(10):e1109. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001109 PMID: 17971872 37. Mabragaña E, Díaz de Astarloa JM, Hanner R, Zhang J, González Castro M. DNA barcoding iden- tifies Argentine fishes from marine and brackish waters. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28655. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028655 PMID: 22174860 38. Pret V, Falconnier GN, Affholder F, Corbeels M, Chikowo R, Descheemaeker K. Farm resilience to climatic risk. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2025;45(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-024-00998-w PMID: 39925785 39. Esmaeili HR, Teimori A, Zarei F, Sayyadzadeh G. DNA barcoding and species delimitation of the Old World tooth-carps, family Aphaniidae Hoedeman, 1949 (Teleostei: Cyprinodontiformes). PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0231717. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231717 PMID: 32298351 40. Arthington AH, Dulvy NK, Gladstone W, Winfield IJ. Fish conservation in freshwater and marine realms: status, threats and management. Aquatic Conserv. 2016;26(5):838–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/ aqc.2712