Thông tin tài nguyên

The climate impact and land use of cultivated meat: Evaluating agricultural feedstock production

pmc-PMC11753643.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 27 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 22 · Đoạn 58Vị trí nguồn

3. Wyness L. The role of red meat in the diet: Nutrition and health benefits. Proc Nutr Soc. 2016; 75 (3):227–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665115004267 PMID: 26643369 4. Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: The 2012 revision. ESA Working Paper No. 12–03. 2012: 160. 5. OECD, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2023–2032. OECD; 2023. https://doi.org/10.1787/08801ab7-en 6. Parlasca MC, Qaim M. Meat consumption and sustainability. Annu Rev Resour Econ. 2022; 14(1):17– 41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-111820-032340 7. Leroy F, Smith NW, Adesogan AT, Beal T, Iannotti L, Moughan PJ, et al. The role of meat in the human diet: Evolutionary aspects and nutritional value. Anim Front. 2023; 13(2):11–8. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/af/vfac093 PMID: 37073319 8. Smith J, Sones K, Grace D, MacMillan S, Tarawali S, Herrero M. Beyond milk, meat, and eggs: Role of livestock in food and nutrition security. Anim Front. 2013; 3(1):6–13. https://doi.org/10.2527/af. 2013-0002 9. Poore J, Nemecek T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Sci- ence. 2018; 360(6392):987–92. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0216 PMID: 29853680 10. Scarborough P, Clark M, Cobiac L, Papier K, Knuppel A, Lynch J, et al. Vegans, vegetarians, fish-eat- ers and meat-eaters in the UK show discrepant environmental impacts. Nat Food. 2023. https://doi. org/10.1038/s43016-023-00795-w PMID: 37474804

Trang 22 · Đoạn 59Vị trí nguồn

11. Wirsenius S, Azar C, Berndes G. How much land is needed for global food production under scenarios of dietary changes and livestock productivity increases in 2030? Agric Syst. 2010; 103(9):621–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.07.005 12. Wood P, Thorrez L, Hocquette JF, Troy D, Gagaoua M. “Cellular agriculture”: Current gaps between facts and claims regarding “cell-based meat.” Anim Front. 2023; 13(2):68–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/ af/vfac092 PMID: 37073316 13. Johnston J, Weiler A, Baumann S. The cultural imaginary of ethical meat: A study of producer percep- tions. J Rural Stud. 2022; 89:186–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.11.021 14. Lin-Schilstra L, Fischer ARH. Consumer moral dilemma in the choice of animal-friendly meat products. Sustainability. 2020; 12(12):4844. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124844 15. Oleschuk M, Johnston J, Baumann S. Maintaining meat: Cultural repertoires and the meat paradox in a diverse sociocultural context. Sociol Forum. 2019; 34(2):337–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12500 16. Jakobsen J, Hansen A. Geographies of meatification: An emerging Asian meat complex. Globaliza- tions. 2020; 17(1):93–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2019.1614723 17. Godfray HCJ, Aveyard P, Garnett T, Hall JW, Key TJ, Lorimer J, et al. Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science. 2018; 361(6399). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5324 PMID: 30026199 18. Govoni C, Chiarelli DD, Luciano A, Pinotti L, Rulli MC. Global assessment of land and water resource

Trang 22 · Đoạn 60Vị trí nguồn

demand for pork supply. Environ Res Lett. 2022; 17(7):074003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ ac74d7 19. Mottet A, de Haan C, Falcucci A, Tempio G, Opio C, Gerber P. Livestock: On our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate. Glob Food Sec. 2017; 14:1–8. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.gfs.2017.01.001 20. Peters CJ, Picardy JA, Darrouzet-Nardi A, Griffin TS. Feed conversions, ration compositions, and land use efficiencies of major livestock products in U.S. agricultural systems. Agric Syst. 2014; 130:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.06.005 21. Gislason S, Birkved M, Maresca A. A systematic literature review of life cycle assessments on primary pig production: Impacts, comparisons, and mitigation areas. Sustain Prod Consum. 2023; 42:44–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.09.005 22. McAuliffe GA, Chapman DV, Sage CL. A thematic review of life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to pig production. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2016; 56:12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.08.008 23. Lonkila A, Kaljonen M. Promises of meat and milk alternatives: An integrative literature review on emergent research themes. Agric Human Values. 2021; 38(3):625–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10460-020-10184-9 24. Sexton AE, Garnett T, Lorimer J. Framing the future of food: The contested promises of alternative proteins. Environ Plan E Nat Space. 2019; 2(1):47–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619827009 PMID: 32039343 25. Zhang G, Zhao X, Li X, Du G, Zhou J, Chen J. Challenges and possibilities for bio-manufacturing cul-

Trang 22 · Đoạn 61Vị trí nguồn

tured meat. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2020; 97:443–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.01.026 PLOS ONE Evaluating agricultural feedstock for cultivated meat PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316480 January 22, 2025 22 / 27