Men deny more than they believe about climate change on Twitter (X)

8. Al-Saqaf W and Berglez P. How do social media users link different types of extreme events to climate change? A study of Twitter during 2008–2017. Journal of Extreme Events. 2019 Jun 6; 6(02):1950002. 9. Veltri G. A., and Atanasova D. (2017). Climate change on Twitter: content, media ecology and informa- tion sharing behaviour. Public Underst. Sci. 26, 721–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515613702 PMID: 26612869 10. IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge Univer- sity Press. 11. Berglez P and Al-Saqaf W. Extreme weather and climate change: social media results, 2008–2017. Environmental Hazards. 2021 Aug 8; 20(4):382–99. 12. Maibach E. W., Roser-Renouf C., & Leiserowitz A. (2010). Communication and marketing as climate change–intervention assets a public health perspective. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39 (4), 377–379. 13. Howe PD, Mildenberger M, Marlon JR, Leiserowitz A. Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA. Nature Climate Change. 2015 14. Pearce W., Holmberg K., Hellsten I., & Nerlich B. (2018). Climate change on Twitter: Topics, communi- ties and conversations about the 2013 IPCC Working Group 1 report. PloS One, 13(4), e0196588. 15. Brossard D., & Shanahan J. (2013). Do they know what they read? Building a scientific literacy mea- surement instrument based on climate change. Science Communication, 35(3), 328–352.

16. Lin YR, Keegan B, Margolin D, Lazer D. Rising tides or rising stars?: Dynamics of shared attention on Twitter during media events. PloS one. 2014; 9(5):e94093. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0094093 PMID: 24854030 17. Sakaki T, Okazaki M, Matsuo Y. Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. ACM; 2010. p. 851– 860. 18. Briones R. L., Kuch B., Liu B. F., & Jin Y. (2012). Keeping up with the digital age: How the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 38(3), 37–43. 19. Cook J., Bedford D., Mandia S., & Lewandowsky S. (2015). Recursive fury: Conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–8. 20. Tyagi A., Uyheng J. & Carley K.M. Heated conversations in a warming world: affective polarization in online climate change discourse follows real-world climate anomalies. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 11, 87 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-021-00792-6 21. Falkenberg M., Galeazzi A., Torricelli M. et al. Growing polarization around climate change on social media. Nat. Clim. Chang. 12, 1114–1121 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01527-x 22. Chen X, Zou L, Zhao B. Detecting climate change deniers on twitter using a deep neural network. In Proceedings of the 2019 11th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing 2019 Feb 22 (pp. 204–210).

23. Chen K., Molder A. L., Duan Z., Boulianne S., Eckart C., Mallari P., & Yang D. (2023). How Climate Movement Actors and News Media Frame Climate Change and Strike: Evidence from Analyzing Twitter and News Media Discourse from 2018 to 2021. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 28(2), 384– 413. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221106405 24. Meyer H., Peach A., Guenther L., Kedar H., & Bru¨ggemann M. (2023). Between Calls for Action and Narratives of Denial: Climate Change Attention Structures on Twitter. Media and Communication, 11 (1), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6111 25. Walter S., Lo¨rcher I., & Bru¨ggemann M. (2019). Scientific networks on Twitter: Analyzing scientists’ interactions in the climate change debate. Public Understanding of Science, 28(6), 696–712. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0963662519844131 PMID: 31027461 26. Moernaut R., Mast J., Temmerman M., & Broersma M. (2020). Hot weather, hot topic. Polarization and sceptical framing in the climate debate on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 25(8), 1047– 1066. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1834600 27. Cook J., Nuccitelli D., Green S. A., Richardson M., Winkler B., Painting R., & Skuce A. (2013). Quantify- ing the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8(2), 024024. 28. Cook J., Oreskes N., Doran P. T., Anderegg W. R., Verheggen B., Maibach E. W., & Carlton J. S. (2016). Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warm-

ing. Environmental Research Letters, 11(4), 048002. 29. Sanford M, Painter J, Yasseri T, Lorimer J. Controversy around climate change reports: a case study of Twitter responses to the 2019 IPCC report on land. Climatic change. 2021 Aug; 167(3):1–25. PLOS ONE Men deny climate change on Twitter PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303007 February 13, 2025 8 / 9