Expected global suitability of coffee, cashew and avocado due to climate change
pmc-PMC8791496.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 24 trang
Discussion Current crop suitability compared to main producing regions As could be expected by the biophysical requirements of coffee, cashew and avocado (Table 1), both temperature and precipitation criteria represented the most limiting factors for the suit- ability of the three crops in different regions. However, for all three crops, low soil pH was shown to be an additional important limiting factor in South America (Amazon basin), Cen- tral Africa (Congo basin), Southeast Asia (e.g. Sumatra, Malaysia, Borneo, New Guinea). In certain regions, also steep slopes and unfavourable soil texture were identified as important limitations. We therefore conclude that the integration of topographic and soil factors is cru- cial for improving current and future crop suitability modelling, especially on a regional or local scale. The modelled global suitable regions of coffee, cashew and avocado comprise most major producing countries based on FAOSTAT (www.fao.org/faostat). For coffee arabica, suitable growing regions were identified in all major producing countries. In our analysis, however, certain major cashew producing countries (India, Senegal, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Burkina Faso) resulted in low cashew suitability. Some of the growing regions in these countries were rated as unsuitable because they have a dry season lasting longer than six months. We therefore con- clude that this criterion is either too restrictive with cashew being a drought tolerant crop [24], or that irrigation during the dry season is required in these regions. When changing the length
of the dry season for unsuitable areas (N) from more than six to more than seven months, the major growing regions in India and West Africa lie within the suitable area. Similarly, suitable avocado growing areas were found in most but not all major producing countries and regions according to our model. Some of the growing regions of Peru (coastal area), the USA (Califor- nia), Chile, South Africa, Spain, Morocco, Israel and Australia were rated as not suitable for avocado cultivation. On the one hand, this limitation is due to insufficient annual precipitation in some of these regions, where avocados are in fact irrigated [30]. On the other hand, low minimum temperatures in the coldest month co-limit suitability in some of these regions, indicating that this criterion could be too restrictive. This is supported by Wolstenholme [30] who reported growing areas with minimum temperatures during the coldest month of below 8˚C (rated as ‘unsuitable’ in our model) in parts of California, Israel, New Zealand, South Africa and southern Australia. However, the same author also mentioned the importance of good site selection and management practices from the point of view of frost in order to reduce frost damage in these marginal areas. Shifts in crop suitability due to climate change When taking into account climate change scenarios, shifts in suitable growing regions are expected for all three crops, with both some of today’s suitable growing regions disappearing and new ones emerging. Compared to cashew and avocado, climate change has the highest
negative impact on currently suitable coffee growing regions because of its greater suscepti- bility to high temperatures. While cashew suitability is also negatively affected by rising tem- peratures in certain regions, avocado is more affected by changes in precipitation (both negatively and positively). All three crops, however, profit from increasing minimum tem- peratures at high latitudes and high altitudes. The impacts of the three RCPs (2.6, 4.5 and 8.5) applied in our model generally show similar patterns. For coffee, the negative impacts on current growing regions clearly intensify from RCP 2.6 to 8.5. The same is true for cashew and avocado, where both positive and negative global as well as regional trends intensify from RCP 2.6 to 8.5. PLOS ONE Global suitability of coffee, cashew and avocado PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261976 January 26, 2022 18 / 24