Thông tin tài nguyên

International climate adaptation assistance: Assessing public support in Switzerland

pmc-PMC11819516.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 26 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 22 · Đoạn 53Vị trí nguồn

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317344 February 12, 2025 22 / 26 PLOS ONE Support for adaptation assistance in Switzerland Funding acquisition: Liliana Andonova, Nives Dolšak. Investigation: Liliana Andonova, Agnese Zucca, Simon Montfort, Nives Dolšak, Aseem Prakash. Methodology: Liliana Andonova, Agnese Zucca, Simon Montfort, Nives Dolšak, Aseem Prakash. Project administration: Liliana Andonova, Agnese Zucca. Resources: Liliana Andonova, Agnese Zucca. Software: Agnese Zucca, Simon Montfort. Supervision: Liliana Andonova. Validation: Liliana Andonova, Agnese Zucca, Simon Montfort, Nives Dolšak, Aseem Prakash. Visualization: Simon Montfort. Writing – original draft: Liliana Andonova. Writing – review & editing: Liliana Andonova, Agnese Zucca, Simon Montfort, Nives Dolšak, Aseem Prakash. References 1. Putnam RD. Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. Int Org. 1988;42(3):427–60. 2. Newell P, Mulvaney D. The political economy of the ‘just transition’. Geogr J. 2013;179(2):132–40. 3. Aklin M, Mildenberger M. Prisoners of the wrong dilemma: why distributive conflict, not collective action, characterizes the politics of climate change. Glob Environ Polit. 2020;20(4):4–27. https://doi. org/10.1162/glep_a_00578 4. Dolšak N, Prakash A. Three faces of climate justice. Annu Rev Polit Sci. 2022;25(1):283–301. https:// doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-125514 5. Gaikwad N, Genovese F, Tingley D. Creating climate coalitions: mass preferences for compensating

Trang 22 · Đoạn 54Vị trí nguồn

vulnerability in the world’s two largest democracies. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2022;116(4):1165–83. https:// doi.org/10.1017/s0003055422000223 6. Andonova LB, Hale TN, Roger CB. National policy and transnational governance of climate change: substitutes or complements? Int Stud Q. 2017;61(2):253–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx014 7. Andonova LB, Hale TN, Roger C, editors. The comparative politics of transnational climate gover- nance. Routledge; 2018. 8. Brink E, Wamsler C. Citizen engagement in climate adaptation surveyed: the role of values, worldviews, gender and place. J Clean Prod. 2019;209:1342–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2018.10.164 9. Harris BS, Howe PD. What factors are associated with public support for climate change adaptation policy in the U.S.? Environ Res Commun. 2023;5(9):091003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ acf4e1 10. Yazar M, York A. Disentangling justice as recognition through public support for local climate adaptation policies: insights from the Southwest US. Urban Climate. 2022;41:101079. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101079 11. Ray A, Hughes L, Konisky DM, Kaylor C. Extreme weather exposure and support for climate change adaptation. Glob Environ Chang. 2017;46:104–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.07.002 12. Kruse T, Atkinson G. Understanding public support for international climate adaptation pay- ments: evidence from a choice experiment. Ecol Econ. 2022;194:107321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2021.107321

Trang 22 · Đoạn 55Vị trí nguồn

13. Klöck C, Molenaers N, Weiler F. Responsibility, capacity, greenness or vulnerability? What explains the levels of climate aid provided by bilateral donors? Environ Polit. 2018;27(5):892–916. https://doi. org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1480273 14. Donner SD, Kandlikar M, Webber S. Measuring and tracking the flow of climate change adaptation aid to the developing world. Environ Res Lett. 2016;11(5):054006. https://doi. org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054006