Inequality of opportunity in selection procedures limits diversity in higher education: An intersectional study of Dutch selective higher education programs
pmc-PMC10575509.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 24 trang
45. Van den Broek A, de Korte K, Cuppen J, Wartenbergh F, Bendig-Jacobs J, Mulder J, et al. Monitor Beleidsmaatregelen 2017–2018: Studiekeuze, studiegedrag & leengedrag in relatie tot beleidsmaatre- gelen in het hoger onderwijs, 2006–2017. Nijmegen: ResearchNed; 2018. 46. Stegers-Jager K, Themmen A, Cohen-Schotanus J, Steyerberg E. Predicting performance: relative importance of students’ background and past performance. Med Educ 2015; 49(9):933–45. https://doi. org/10.1111/medu.12779 PMID: 26296410 47. Stegers-Jager K. Lessons learned from 15 years of non-grades-based selection for medical school. Med Educ. 2018; 52(1):86–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13462 PMID: 28984374 48. Steven K, Dowell J, Jackson C, Guthrie B. Fair access to medicine? Retrospective analysis of UK medi- cal schools application data 2009–2012 using three measures of socioeconomic status. BMC Med Educ. 2016; 16(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0536-1 PMID: 26759058 49. Niven V, Andiappan M, Cabot L, Gallagher JE. Embarking on a professional career: social advantage in dentistry and medicine. UK dental and medical student applications and admissions, 1996–2011. British Dental Journal. 2019; 227(5):411–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-019-0671-2 PMID: 31520046 50. Wouters A. Getting to know our non-traditional and rejected medical school applicants. Perspect Med Educ. 2020; 9:132–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00579-z PMID: 32270368 51. Southgate E, Kelly BJ, Symonds IM. Disadvantage and the ‘capacity to aspire’ to medical school. Med
Educ. 2015; 49(1):73–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12540 PMID: 25545575 52. Hadinger MA. Underrepresented minorities in medical school admissions: a qualitative study. Teach and Learn in Med. 2017; 29(1):31–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2016.1220861 PMID: 27824260 53. Author. (Anonymized). (Anonymized). 2022. 54. Simundic A-M. Bias in research. Biochemia medica. 2013; 23(1):12–5. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm. 2013.003 PMID: 23457761 55. Dutch Inspectorate of Education. The state of education 2022 [De staat van het onderwijs 2022]. Minis- try of Education, Culture and Science. 2022. 56. Fikrat-Wevers S, Stegers-Jager KM, Afonso PM, Koster AS, Van Gestel RA, Groenier M, et al. Selec- tion tools and student diversity in health professions education: a multi-site study. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10204-9 PMID: 36653557 57. Lasselle L, McDougall-Bagnall J, Smith I. School grades, school context and university degree perfor- mance: Evidence from an elite Scottish institution. Oxford Review of Education. 2014; 40(3):293–314. 58. Hoare A, Johnston R. Widening participation through admissions policy–a British case study of school and university performance. Studies in Higher Education. 2011; 36(1):21–41. 59. Crul M, Schneider J, Keskiner E, Lelie F. The multiplier effect: how the accumulation of cultural and social capital explains steep upward social mobility of children of low-educated immigrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2017; 40(2):321–38.
60. Luyendijk J. The seven check marks: How men like myself play the boss [De zeven vinkjes: Hoe man- nen zoals ik de baas spelen]. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Pluim; 2022. 61. Badaou M. Era of connection: The value of cultural diversity in the healthcare system. Amsterdam Medi- cal Student journal. 2020; 20:23–4. 62. Upshur CC, Wrighting DM, Bacigalupe G, Becker J, Hayman L, Lewis B, et al. The Health Equity Schol- ars Program: innovation in the leaky pipeline. Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities. 2018; 5 (2):342–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-017-0376-7 PMID: 28526974 63. Ashley R, Goodarzi B, Horn A, de Klerk H, E Ku S, Marcus JK, et al. A call for critical midwifery studies: Confronting systemic injustice in sexual, reproductive, maternal, and newborn care. Birth, issues in peri- natal care. 2022; 49:355–9. 64. Fikrat-Wevers S, Stegers-Jager K, Groenier M, Koster A, Ravesloot JH, Van Gestel R, et al. Applicant perceptions of selection methods for health professions education: Rationales and subgroup differ- ences. Medical Education. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14949 PMID: 36215062 65. Steenman S. Alignment of Admission: An Exploration and Analysis of the Links between Learning Objectives and Selective Admission to Programmes in Higher Education: Utrecht University; 2018. 66. Greenland S, Finkle WD. A Critical Look at Methods for Handling Missing Covariates in Epidemiologic Regression Analyses. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1995; 142(12):1255–64. https://doi.org/10. 1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117592 PMID: 7503045 PLOS ONE
Inequality of opportunity in Dutch selection procedures limits diversity in higher education PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292805 October 13, 2023 24 / 24