Thông tin tài nguyên

Visual art inspired by climate change—An analysis of audience reactions to 37 artworks presented during 21st UN climate summit in Paris

pmc-PMC7894892.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 18 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 17 · Đoạn 46Vị trí nguồn

33. Wertheimer M. A brief introduction to gestalt, identifying key theories and principles. Psychol Forsch. 1923; 4:301–50. 34. Doyle J. Mediating climate change. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing; 2011. 35. Leder H. Next steps in neuroaesthetics: Which processes and processing stages to study? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2013; 7(1):27. 36. Chatterjee A. Disembodying cognition. Language and cognition. 2010; 2(1):79–116. https://doi.org/10. 1515/LANGCOG.2010.004 PMID: 20802833 37. Chatterjee A. Neuroaesthetics: a coming of age story. Journal of cognitive neuroscience. 2011; 23 (1):53–62. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21457 PMID: 20175677 38. Tinio PP. From artistic creation to aesthetic reception: The mirror model of art. Psychology of Aesthet- ics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2013; 7(3):265. 39. Zaidel DW, Nadal M, Flexas A, Munar E. An evolutionary approach to art and aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2013; 7(1):100. 40. Pfister H-R, Bo¨ hm G. The multiplicity of emotions: A framework of emotional functions in decision mak- ing. Judgment and decision making. 2008; 3(1):5. 41. Swim JK, Bloodhart B. Portraying the perils to polar bears: The role of empathic and objective perspec- tive-taking toward animals in climate change communication. Environmental Communication. 2015; 9 (4):446–68. 42. Rees JH, Klug S, Bamberg S. Guilty conscience: motivating pro-environmental behavior by inducing negative moral emotions. Climatic change. 2015; 130(3):439–52.

Trang 17 · Đoạn 47Vị trí nguồn

43. O’Neill S, Nicholson-Cole S. "Fear won’t do it" promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication. 2009; 30(3):355–79. 44. Silvia PJ, Brown EM. Anger, disgust, and the negative aesthetic emotions: Expanding an appraisal model of aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2007; 1(2):100. 45. Silvia PJ. Looking past pleasure: anger, confusion, disgust, pride, surprise, and other unusual aesthetic emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2009; 3(1):48. 46. Locher PJ. The aesthetic experience with visual art "at first glance". Investigations Into the Phenome- nology and the Ontology of the Work of Art: Springer, Cham; 2015. p. 75–88. 47. White AE, Kaufman JC, Riggs M. How "outsider" do we like our art?: Influence of artist background on perceptions of warmth, creativity, and likeability. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2014; 8(2):144. 48. Nodine C, Mello-Thoms C, Krupinski E, Locher P. Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience. Spatial vision. 2008; 21(1–2):55–77. 49. Lengieza ML, Hunt CA, Swim JK. Measuring eudaimonic travel experiences. Annals of Tourism Research. 2019; 74(C):195–7. 50. Bamberg S, Schmidt P. Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students’ car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis. Environment and behavior. 2003; 35(2):264–85. 51. Stern PC. New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behav-

Trang 17 · Đoạn 48Vị trí nguồn

ior. Journal of social issues. 2000; 56(3):407–24. 52. De Groot JI, Steg L. Morality and prosocial behavior: The role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the Norm Activation Model. The Journal of social psychology. 2009; 149(4):425–49. https://doi.org/ 10.3200/SOCP.149.4.425-449 PMID: 19702104 53. Curtis DJ, Reid N, Reeve I. Towards ecological sustainability: Observations on the role of the arts. SAPI EN S Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society. 2014;(7.1). 54. Muthe´n L, Muthe´n B. Mplus user’s guide, 8th edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthe´ n & Muthe´n. 1998– 2019. 55. Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L. Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global environmental change. 2007; 17(3–4):445– 59. 56. Moser SC. Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: what more is there to say? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 2016; 7(3):345–69. 57. Gabrys J, Yusoff K. Arts, sciences and climate change: practices and politics at the threshold. Science as culture. 2012; 21(1):1–24. 58. Jacobs R, Benford S, Selby M, Golembewski M, Price D, Giannachi G, editors. A conversation between trees: what data feels like in the forest. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470663 PMID: 24634895 PLOS ONE Visual art inspired by climate change — An analysis of audience reactions

Trang 17 · Đoạn 49Vị trí nguồn

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247331 February 19, 2021 17 / 18