Visual art inspired by climate change—An analysis of audience reactions to 37 artworks presented during 21st UN climate summit in Paris

8. Arce-Nazario JA. Translating land-use science to a museum exhibit. Journal of land use science. 2016; 11(4):417–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2016.1172129 PMID: 28191029 9. Chandler L, Baldwin C. Views from the Water’s Edge: The Impact of Images in Communicating Per- spectives of Climate Change. Mapping minds: Brill; 2010. p. 95–106. 10. Curtis DJ, Reid N, Ballard G. Communicating ecology through art: what scientists think. Ecology and Society. 2012; 17(2). 11. Grant B, Baldwin C, Lieske SN, Martin K. Using participatory visual methods for information exchange about climate risk in canal estate communities. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs. 2015; 7 (1):23–37. 12. Preminger S. Transformative art: art as means for long-term neurocognitive change. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2012; 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00096 PMID: 22536178 13. Pelowski M, Markey PS, Lauring JO, Leder H. Visualizing the impact of art: an update and comparison of current psychological models of art experience. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2016; 10. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00160 PMID: 27199697 14. Chatterjee A. Prospects for a cognitive neuroscience of visual aesthetics. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts. 2004; 4(2):56–60. 15. Leder H, Nadal M. Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: the aes- thetic episode–developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology. 2014; 105(4):443–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12084 PMID: 25280118

16. Leder H, Belke B, Oeberst A, Augustin D. A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British journal of psychology. 2004; 95(4):489–508. 17. Pelowski M, Akiba F. A model of art perception, evaluation and emotion in transformative aesthetic experience. New Ideas in Psychology. 2011; 29(2):80–97. 18. Silvia PJ. Emotional responses to art: From collation and arousal to cognition and emotion. Review of general psychology. 2005; 9(4):342. 19. Silvia PJ. Cognitive appraisals and interest in visual art: Exploring an appraisal theory of aesthetic emo- tions. Empirical studies of the arts. 2005; 23(2):119–33. 20. Locher PJ, Overbeeke K, Wensveen S. Aesthetic interaction: A framework. Design Issues. 2010; 26 (2):70–9. 21. van Paasschen J, Bacci F, Melcher DP. The influence of art expertise and training on emotion and pref- erence ratings for representational and abstract artworks. PLoS One. 2015; 10(8):e0134241. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134241 PMID: 26244368 22. Leder H, Gerger G, Dressler SG, Schabmann A. How art is appreciated. Psychology of Aesthetics, Cre- ativity, and the Arts. 2012; 6(1):2. 23. Leder H, Gerger G, Brieber D, Schwarz N. What makes an art expert? Emotion and evaluation in art appreciation. Cognition and Emotion. 2014; 28(6):1137–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013. 870132 PMID: 24383619 24. Buttel FH. Age and environmental concern: a multivariate analysis. Youth & Society. 1979; 10(3):237– 56. 25. Jones RE, Dunlap RE. The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time? 1.

Rural sociology. 1992; 57(1):28–47. 26. Kanagy CL, Humphrey CR, Firebaugh G. Surging environmentalism: Changing public opinion or chang- ing publics? Social Science Quarterly. 1994. PMID: 11656416 27. Ozanne LK, Humphrey CR, Smith PM. Gender, environmentalism, and interest in forest certification: Mohai’s paradox revisited. Society & Natural Resources. 1999; 12(6):613–22. 28. Clayton SD. The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology: Oxford University Press; 2012. 29. Kaiser FG, Bru¨ gger A, Hartig T, Bogner FX, Gutscher H. Appreciation of nature and appreciation of environmental protection: How stable are these attitudes and which comes first? European review of applied psychology. 2014; 64(6):269–77. 30. Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Action control: Springer; 1985. p. 11– 39. 31. Kaiser FG, Oerke B, Bogner FX. Behavior-based environmental attitude: Development of an instrument for adolescents. Journal of environmental psychology. 2007; 27(3):242–51. 32. Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W. The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Jour- nal of consciousness Studies. 1999; 6(6–7):15–51. PLOS ONE Visual art inspired by climate change — An analysis of audience reactions PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247331 February 19, 2021 16 / 18