Spatial priorities for freshwater biodiversity conservation in light of catchment protection and connectivity in Europe

25. Holland RA, Darwall WRT, Smith KG. Conservation priorities for freshwater biodiversity: The Key Biodi- versity Area approach refined and tested for continental Africa. Biol Conserv. 2012; 148: 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.016. 26. Lawrence DJ, Larson ER, Liemann CAR, Mims MC, Pool TK, Olden JD. National parks as protected areas for U.S. freshwater fish diversity. Conserv Lett. 2011; 4: 364–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j1755- 263x-2011-00185-x. 27. Hermoso V, Linke S, Prenda J, Possingham HP. Addressing longitudinal connectivity in the systematic conservation planning of fresh waters. Freshw Biol. 2011; 56: 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2427.2009.02390.x. 28. Linke S, Kennard MJ, Hermoso V, Olden JD, Stein J, Pusey BJ. Merging connectivity rules and large- scale condition assessment improves conservation adequacy in river systems. J Appl Ecol. 2012b; 49: 1036–1045. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02177.x. 29. Keith P. The part played by protected areas in the conservation of threatened French freshwater fish. Biol Conserv. 2000; 92: 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3207(99)00041-5. 30. Moilanen A, Leathwick JR, Quinn JM. Spatial prioritization of conservation management. Conserv Lett. 2011; 4: 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00190.x. 31. Linke S, Hermoso V, Thieme M. Preliminary results of a freshwater biodiversity Marxan analysis for the Democratic Republic of Congo. Kinshana: Program to Reinforce the Protected Area Network, De´part- ment Technique & Scientifique ICCN, 2012a.

32. Nel JL, Reyers B, Roux DJ, Impson ND, Cowling RM. Designing a conservation area network that sup- ports the representation and persistence of freshwater biodiversity. Freshw Biol. 2011; 56: 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02437.x. 33. Linke S, Norris RH, Pressey RL. Irreplaceability of river networks: towards catchment-based conserva- tion planning. J Appl Ecol. 2008; 45: 1486–1495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01520.x. 34. Nel JL, Roux DJ, Maree G, Kleynhans CJ, Moolman J, Reyers B, et al. Rivers in peril inside and outside protected areas: a systematic approach to conservation assessment of river ecosystems. Divers Dist. 2007; 13: 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2006.00308.x. 35. Lehner B. HydroBASINS Version1.b. Global watershed boundaries and sub-basin delineation derived from HydroSHEDS data at 15 second resolution; 2012. Available from: http://hydrosheds.org/page/ hydrobasins. 36. IUCN, 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (accessed 22 April 2020). Available from: https:// www.iucnredlist.org 37. Biofresh. Freshwater Information Platform, 2013. Available at: http://project.freshwaterbiodiversity.eu/. 38. McIntyre PB, Liermann CAR, Revenga C. Linking freshwater fishery management to global food secu- rity and biodiversity conservation. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2016; 113: 12880–12885. https://doi.org/10. 1073/pnas.1521540113 PMID: 27791055 39. Vaughn CC. Ecosystem services provided by freshwater mussels. Hydrobiologia 2018; 810: 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3139-x

40. May ML. Odonata: Who they are and what they have done for us lately: Classification and ecosystem services of dragonflies. Insects 2019; 10: 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10030062 PMID: 30823469 41. O’Hare M, Aguiar FC, Asaeda T, Bakker ES, Chambers PA, Clayton JS, et al. Plants in aquatic ecosys- tems: current trends and future directions. Hydrobiologia 2018; 812: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10750-017-3190-7. 42. Abell R, Thieme ML, Revenga C, Bryer M, Kottelat M, Bogutskaya N, et al. Freshwater ecoregions of the world: A new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. BioScience. 2008; 58: 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1641/b580507. 43. Ball IR, Possingham HP, Watts M. Marxan and Relatives: Software for Spatial Conservation Prioritiza- tion. In: Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham HP, editors. Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantita- tive Methods and Computational Tools. Oxford: University Press Oxford; 2009. pp. 185–195. 44. Moilanen A, Leathwick J, Elith J. A method for spatial freshwater conservation prioritization. Freshw Biol. 2008; 53: 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01906.x. 45. Ardron JA, Possingham HP, Klein CJ. Marxan Good Practices Handbook. Vancouver: Pacific Marine Analysis and Research Association; 2008. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2007.126045 PMID: 17766429 46. EEA. Natura 2000 End 2013, 2013 Available from: http://www.eea.europa.eu 47. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA), 2013. Available from: http://protecteplanet.net. PLOS ONE

Spatial priorities for freshwater biodiversity in Europe PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267801 May 17, 2022 14 / 15